Status
Not open for further replies.

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160
Hi so I am upgrading my crossfire 6970s to a single 7970, so I am curious which one will give me the closest performance to CFX 6970s (in other words best 'OCability'). My budget is about 480.

I've heard the HIS IceQ is a good one and the cooling on that looks pretty nice for some OCing..
 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160
I was looking at some of those also, I could probably get one but idk the 7970 has much better overall bandwidth and 384-bit 3gb memory (when i run skyrim on current rig it takes 2.6gb vram)....
 

Chairman Ray

Honorable
Jun 13, 2012
563
0
11,060
Until they drop the price of the 7970 another $50 or so, it will give less performance for the price than the 670 or the 680. With your budget, you might be able to squeeze in a cheaper gtx 680, or opt for a 670, which is very close to the performance of a 680.
 

storm79

Honorable
Jun 20, 2012
1
0
10,510



MSI HD 7970 Lightining is the best choise!! It also beats the GTX680!! Awesome card!!!
 

cybersheep

Honorable
May 6, 2012
70
0
10,630

the nvidia drivers were actually bugged resulting in about 18% loss in performance or so iv heard, there new beta drivers are out which seem to fix the bug
the 7970 will most likely not get better
 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160
I think I will get an MSI Lightning as @storm79 mentioned becuase I really need the extra vram and gtx680s 2gb is just not enough. I will OC it past the performance of a gtx680 and i did hear that amd is releasing new drivers for 7970 soon that also will increase perf (not sure if true)
 

doron

Distinguished
Feb 15, 2009
553
0
19,010
The 18% increase sounds great, it is however for some specific titles and not across the board as cybersheep suggests.

IMO you should stay with your current config longer as spending 400+ dollars for 20-30 percent increase in performance (best case) doesn't justify getting a new gpu, especially when your cards get you over 60 fps in most scenarios.
 


That card is way too big and I have had multiple MSI GPUs die by either a bad fan or just stop working.

I say wait to see about Sapphires Vapor-X or Toxic (the Vapor-X is supposed to have 6GB of VRAM) as those are normally the top of the line AMD GPUs.
 

aznplayer213

Distinguished
Jul 21, 2010
151
0
18,690



are you having bad micro stuttering? 2 6970s are still good but generally most people stay away from multi-card setup because of micro stuttering.
 
The 680 will allow you to enable Ambient Occlusion and Transparency Supersampling in Skyrim, which the 7970 lacks.
http://www.geforce.com/Optimize/Guides/the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim-tweak-guide?sf2686171=1/#19

Skyrim-AO-Comparison.gif


Skyrim-AA-AdvancedAA-Comparison.gif


Quote:
"NVIDIA has an option to turn on Super-Sampling at 2X, 4X, and 8X which improves aliasing on all transparent objects like fences and vegetation. AMD also offers a version of this without the ability to select the level of SSAA, called Adaptive SSAA. When we attempted to turn on Adaptive SSAA on the AMD video cards we experience choppy performance which was unplayable. It doesn't quite make sense to us, since the video cards have a large framebuffer of 3GB and high memory bandwidth. For whatever reason, Adaptive SSAA is not playable on the AMD video cards in this game. However, Transparency Supersampling on the NVIDIA GTX 580 is playable. At 4X TR SSAA performance was slower than the AMD cards, but well within what's playable for this game."
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/03/20/msi_r7970_lightning_video_card_review/6



And if that's not enough, even a top of the line factory overclocked MSI 7970 Lightning can't beat a stock GTX 680 in Skyrim.
skyrim_1920_1200.gif

HD7970-LIGHTNING-70.jpg
 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160
Those benches only show a few fps diff between stock 7970 and stock 680 which is not bad, plus if i OC it will likely beat even a OC 680 from what I hear plus i dont really need that extra stuff in skyrim i already have over 100 hrs and dont play it much anymore. mostly bf3, metro2033, cod4 (could play that on ultra on integrated lol), and crysis 2. i sold both 6970s for 500$ and i have a little extra and ive probably decided on a 7970, lightning is a bit to expensive w/ tax and shipping so i am thinking that gigabyte with triple fans....?
 

You shouldn't have sold the HD 6970s, cause technically 2 HD 6970s in CF are better than a single HD 7970, in terms of FPS you won't feel that you made an upgrade unless you had negative scaling with the 2 HD 6970s.

HD 7970 is about 7-8% slower than GTX 680 (stock vs stock speeds) when the HD 7970 is clocked @ 1100 MHz more and it's easy to do, the game becomes the only determinant whether it favors AMD or nVidia cards.

The Gigabyte is pretty good one and costs less, also it overclocks nearly to the Lightening levels, as far as I saw, the Lightening hit max 1210 MHz and the Gigabyte hit 1200 MHz.
 

iyzik

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2012
901
0
19,160


Yes I completely agree with you saying I shouldn't have sold them, the problem was I WAS getting negative scaling in a couple games and real bad microstutter, screen tearing (when there was no v-sync to enable) and overheating problems. I understand this is not an upgrade it was more just to get rid of all the annoying issues of crossfire. And considering one 6970 could run almost any game maxed, I'm sure the 7970 will be awesome.

I ended up choosing the HIS IceQ X2 one so thanks for all the help guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.