Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
So, what's the truth behind all these accounts of looters breaking into
camera stores and tossing Olympus E300's contemptuously aside as they search
for something worth stealing?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 19:16:23 +0100, "Topic" <no@no.com> wrote:
>So, what's the truth behind all these accounts of looters breaking into
>camera stores and tossing Olympus E300's contemptuously aside as they search
>for something worth stealing?
>
Maybe they all have your photographic skill and keep looking for
that magical camera that will turn them into someone with talent?
-Rich
"Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
never gave us refunds for in the past"
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Topic <no@no.com> wrote:
>So, what's the truth behind all these accounts of looters breaking into
>camera stores and tossing Olympus E300's contemptuously aside as they search
>for something worth stealing?
Or breaking into the camera stores in order to leave behind Sigma dSLRs.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Gormless" <simeon@gormless.com> wrote in message
newsuSdnZ2dnZ13JBT9nZ2dnQU2hN6dnZ2dRVnyqp2dnZ0@pipex.net...
> No I don't own one, I'm a through and through Canon man, and I'm in the
UK.
> I'm just amazed that a Yank could stoop so low as to make "humourous"
> comments around the area of their greatest ever disaster (after Bush, that
> is, and he's both - humour (though unintentional) and a disaster).
> Gorm.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Guy,
In all seriousness (heehee) it does seem that the US and UK sense of
humor is a bit different. Nothing wrong with it, just different.
Paul
Claim Guy wrote:
> "Gormless" <simeon@gormless.com> wrote in message
> newsuSdnZ2dnZ13JBT9nZ2dnQU2hN6dnZ2dRVnyqp2dnZ0@pipex.net...
>
>
>
>>No I don't own one, I'm a through and through Canon man, and I'm in the
>
> UK.
>
>>I'm just amazed that a Yank could stoop so low as to make "humourous"
>>comments around the area of their greatest ever disaster (after Bush, that
>>is, and he's both - humour (though unintentional) and a disaster).
>>Gorm.
>
>
>
> It was humourous, and you are are a wanker.
>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Claim Guy" <porthos_jbNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YMOdnZ2dnZ2HTfLZnZ2dnUTkgN6dnZ2dRVn-z52dnZ0@rogers.com...
>
>
> It was humourous, and you are are a wanker.
>
Aww, bless. The truth is so hurtful.
The wanker is Bush.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Gormless" <simeon@gormless.com> wrote in message
news:m8-dnZ2dnZ2JN2b7nZ2dnRXNgt6dnZ2dRVny3Z2dnZ0@pipex.net...
> Aww, bless. The truth is so hurtful.
> The wanker is Bush.
Is that the typical way you reply to criticism when you don't have anything
witty to say - "the truth is so hurtful"?
I bet it saves you a lot of trouble thinking and leaves you with a real warm
feeling of superiority - just like when you unwrap the chips from the
newspaper.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Ray Fischer wrote:
> Topic <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>>So, what's the truth behind all these accounts of looters breaking into
>>camera stores and tossing Olympus E300's contemptuously aside as they search
>>for something worth stealing?
>
>
> Or breaking into the camera stores in order to leave behind Sigma dSLRs.
They did steal some Sigmas, but they returned them.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
That bad eh?
SMS wrote:
> Ray Fischer wrote:
>
>> Topic <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, what's the truth behind all these accounts of looters breaking
>>> into camera stores and tossing Olympus E300's contemptuously aside as
>>> they search for something worth stealing?
>>
>>
>>
>> Or breaking into the camera stores in order to leave behind Sigma dSLRs.
>
>
> They did steal some Sigmas, but they returned them.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
<kashe@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:ab02i15efq51a3e0ri9d05a58q4bnvhi3u@4ax.com...
> Shortly afterward, the two founders did an interview with
> Terry Gross on PBS. She asked them if they had ever refrained from
> printing anything because it was just too far over the top. They said
> no, but, after considerable hemming and hawing, admitted that they had
> pulled one thing, after a lot of consideration.
>
> They were going to print a picture of a journalist standing in
> front of the Pentagon. The caption was to read, "'We have everything
> under control' says Quadragon official."
>
> I recently ran across, but forgot the URL, a UK site that
> seems to equal theonion. I'd be happy to have someone come up with the
> name of the site.
>
>
><kashe@sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:ab02i15efq51a3e0ri9d05a58q4bnvhi3u@4ax.com...
>
>> Shortly afterward, the two founders did an interview with
>> Terry Gross on PBS. She asked them if they had ever refrained from
>> printing anything because it was just too far over the top. They said
>> no, but, after considerable hemming and hawing, admitted that they had
>> pulled one thing, after a lot of consideration.
>>
>> They were going to print a picture of a journalist standing in
>> front of the Pentagon. The caption was to read, "'We have everything
>> under control' says Quadragon official."
>>
>> I recently ran across, but forgot the URL, a UK site that
>> seems to equal theonion. I'd be happy to have someone come up with the
>> name of the site.
>>
>
>www.deadbrain.co.uk ?
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.