Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Will a single gtx 670 2gb run 3 monitors?

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
June 27, 2012 7:53:31 AM

Will a single evga GTX 670 2gb run 3 monitors, if not what will.
I want to play BF3 ultra on three monitors
a c 99 U Graphics card
a b C Monitor
June 27, 2012 8:04:29 AM

In that case you'd need a 4GB version and possibly either overclock the card some, or run SLI.

Or you can get a GTX 680.
m
0
l
June 27, 2012 8:10:47 AM

Im just going to get the gtx 680 then.
should I get the 4gb version on the gtx 680 or should it handle 3 monitors just fine.
m
0
l
Related resources
a c 99 U Graphics card
a b C Monitor
June 27, 2012 8:17:40 AM

Your better off getting the 4GB version.
m
0
l
June 27, 2012 8:19:57 AM

or what about waiting for the 7970 ghz editon.
m
0
l
a c 99 U Graphics card
a b C Monitor
June 27, 2012 8:28:11 AM

That's also another possibility, but the GTX 680 is the stronger card.
m
0
l
August 5, 2012 8:21:38 AM

fantastik250 said:
In that case you'd need a 4GB version and possibly either overclock the card some, or run SLI.

Or you can get a GTX 680.

So a single gtx 680 will run bf3 on ultra with 3 monitors full hdmi? I had the same quesion as OP bur cant find a clear answer:/
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
August 5, 2012 1:17:23 PM

an HD 7970 will get the job done ?

m
0
l
August 8, 2012 7:29:51 PM

The GTX 680 will not be the stronger card with multiple monitors.

As the chart above shows, at higher resolutions the GHz Edition etches past the 680, AMD has Eyefinity.
m
0
l
August 12, 2012 11:11:33 PM

Quote:
depends on game and which card in-particular...
in a general sense, your wrong..

I understand you have the HD 7970 but that can be interpreted as you standing up for your hardware you have.
also a sign of biased opinions..


I understand you like nVidia, but that can be interpreted as you standing up for your hardware you have, and that is also a sign of biased opinions.

Look if you are going to do the usual posting of photos from benchmarks, that is fine, but don't lie about it. If it isn't done off of new Catalyst drivers and you refuse to take those into consideration, then anything you try to use that I go look at and see "Catalyst 12.4" or anything other than latest drivers won't matter.
m
0
l
a c 216 U Graphics card
a c 128 C Monitor
August 13, 2012 12:17:12 AM

The point I hope was taken away from those Palit Jetstream benchmarks is that the extra Vram never made a difference in those benchmarks. The only difference in performance was the fact that the Jetstream was factory overclocked.

All this talk about needing 3Gb's or more for high resolutions is mostly just talk. I suppose if you turn up the AA enough, it might matter on rare occasions.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
a b C Monitor
August 13, 2012 2:42:47 AM

I have the windforce 670 and I and running 3x 1920x1080 I can run BF3 on all High didn't try ultra but high is buttery smooth. if looking for only ultra then ya sli no single card will do it. If High is good then get the 670 I am playing BF3/High Dirt 3/Max Wings of Prey/Max Need fo Speed Shift 2/Max all on 3 1080 screens big jump from my 1920x1200 Apple Cinema screen and nothing but BF3 has made me turn anything down.

Thent
m
0
l
August 13, 2012 4:51:43 AM

Quote:
Quote:
I understand you like nVidia, but that can be interpreted as you standing up for your hardware you have, and that is also a sign of biased opinions.

ditto....
you and HD Radeon...

what's your point.?
from your signature it looks like you need to work on your overclocking skillz.
with an H100 and only a 4.2GHz clock make me think you n00bie...
:lol:  :p 


17seconds said:
It would be appreciated if you quit focusing on me, making personal statements, calling names, and instead answer the question posed by the OP, as I did.

Hypocrisy is when someone criticizes others for something they themselves do.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/forum2.php?config=tom...

m
0
l
!