- May 24, 2011
- 46
- 0
- 18,530
I simply want to get rid of some wires, so I am going to get a wireless router. I have one desktop computer with 2.4 and 5ghz wireless card. I use it a lot to stream to my 1080p TV via HDMI cable. Another computer is N, 2.4 and 5ghz, but it sits in a corner and I use it for file storage and backup - very little traffic.
I do have a cellphone, which has wi-fi although I've never hooked it up and I have a Samsung Blu-Ray player with an Internet connection I've never hooked up - but it would be wired with an ethernet cable if I did hook it up. I'm thinking about getting a wi-fi Roku box or similar to stream netflix, etc.
The area where this will be used consists of two rooms totaling about 600 sq. ft. I have a gigabit switch which I can retire or use for the wired connections.
I looked at a D-Link Dir-615 300mbps router, which seems adequate, but...
A 54mbps router would probably work about as well as any for my use (after all, my Internet connection is 10mbps and that's most of the traffic), but it seems kind of silly to go with a g when my devices have N capabilities.
Given that it's just me so there's very little traffic, even though there are a few devices and may soon be one or two more:
Do QOS and the various "media" router featurs really do anything on a low traffic wireless network? In other words, does the traffic management, etc. they provide do anything when there's not much traffic to manage? (If they really do provide support for devices I'm likely to add, maybe that's a reason to get a "media" router.)
When I look at the networks in my neighborhood, I see 15 2.4Ghz networks and 1 very weak 5Ghz network - which it occurs to me might be a good reason to go with the 5Ghz -- Simply to eliminate the spurious packets flying around on 2.4GHz.
I'm inclined to get a basic dual band router so I can use 5ghz because there's no congestion on that bandwidth in my neighborhood. It seems like a 450 mbps router would be throwing my money away, a 300mbps router would still be overkill, but might be worth the money compared to a 150mbps router. Here's a possible 2.4ghz - 5ghz dual band router that's pretty economical: D-Link 815
I did find a dual-band router that was cheap because you have to switch it between 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz - but that sounds just plain dumb!
I'm interested in your comments - especially whether going to 5ghz to reduce wireless congestion in my neighborhood makes sense.
Also, what about a dual band 150mbps vs. a 2.4Ghz 300mbps??
Recommendations on specific routers that would suit my needs and any deals to be had on them would be greatly appreciated. I have no problem with refurb or open box to get a deal.
Note: I'm not partial to D-Link - they just happened to be reasonably priced alternatives I found googling.
I do have a cellphone, which has wi-fi although I've never hooked it up and I have a Samsung Blu-Ray player with an Internet connection I've never hooked up - but it would be wired with an ethernet cable if I did hook it up. I'm thinking about getting a wi-fi Roku box or similar to stream netflix, etc.
The area where this will be used consists of two rooms totaling about 600 sq. ft. I have a gigabit switch which I can retire or use for the wired connections.
I looked at a D-Link Dir-615 300mbps router, which seems adequate, but...
A 54mbps router would probably work about as well as any for my use (after all, my Internet connection is 10mbps and that's most of the traffic), but it seems kind of silly to go with a g when my devices have N capabilities.
Given that it's just me so there's very little traffic, even though there are a few devices and may soon be one or two more:
Do QOS and the various "media" router featurs really do anything on a low traffic wireless network? In other words, does the traffic management, etc. they provide do anything when there's not much traffic to manage? (If they really do provide support for devices I'm likely to add, maybe that's a reason to get a "media" router.)
When I look at the networks in my neighborhood, I see 15 2.4Ghz networks and 1 very weak 5Ghz network - which it occurs to me might be a good reason to go with the 5Ghz -- Simply to eliminate the spurious packets flying around on 2.4GHz.
I'm inclined to get a basic dual band router so I can use 5ghz because there's no congestion on that bandwidth in my neighborhood. It seems like a 450 mbps router would be throwing my money away, a 300mbps router would still be overkill, but might be worth the money compared to a 150mbps router. Here's a possible 2.4ghz - 5ghz dual band router that's pretty economical: D-Link 815
I did find a dual-band router that was cheap because you have to switch it between 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz - but that sounds just plain dumb!
I'm interested in your comments - especially whether going to 5ghz to reduce wireless congestion in my neighborhood makes sense.
Also, what about a dual band 150mbps vs. a 2.4Ghz 300mbps??
Recommendations on specific routers that would suit my needs and any deals to be had on them would be greatly appreciated. I have no problem with refurb or open box to get a deal.
Note: I'm not partial to D-Link - they just happened to be reasonably priced alternatives I found googling.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram