6600 bluetooth, class 1 or class 2?

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

I have no idea what kind of usb Bluetooth dongle I should be looking for, I
found a nice 100m class 1 for AU$88, but I'm not sure what device is correct
for my phone.

--
Maybe I don't want to have a nice day.

Take out the _CURSEING to reply to me

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

Andy wrote:

> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money buying a 100m
> dongle, every dongle is the same, but look for the driver software to be
> Widcomm's
>

I wouldn't bet my month's salary, but I would say you are not right. If
the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a signal up to 100m,
and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone is able to do send/receive
in a 10m range, that means in extreme situation, the dongle and phone
separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to communicate. I
agree the signal will be very low, but still there.

--
JScoobyCed
What about a JScooby snack Shaggy ? ... Shaggy ?!

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

JScoobyCed <pim@pam.poum> wrote in
news:41368a7d$0$28825$636a15ce@news.free.fr:

> Andy wrote:
>
>> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money
>> buying a 100m dongle
>
> If the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a
> signal up to 100m, and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone
> is able to do send/receive in a 10m range, the dongle and phone
> separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to
> communicate.

I don't think this is right. I believe the difference is in
transmit strength only. This means that both ends have to be in the
100m range class to give the extended range.

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

"Andy" <af@inet.hr> schreef in bericht news:ch6q9r$h8g$1@sunce.iskon.hr...
> At this point I don't know, the best is to try someone else's and to see
>
I have a 10m and a 100m dongle from Sitecom. The 100m dongle as an antenna
(!) at the outside and has a much better range.



> "John Carlyle-Clarke" <john.cc@nospam.europlacer.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:Xns95585FA1F4B09johncceuroplacercouk@192.168.1.69...
> > JScoobyCed <pim@pam.poum> wrote in
> > news:41368a7d$0$28825$636a15ce@news.free.fr:
> >
> > > Andy wrote:
> > >
> > >> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money
> > >> buying a 100m dongle
> > >
> > > If the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a
> > > signal up to 100m, and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone
> > > is able to do send/receive in a 10m range, the dongle and phone
> > > separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to
> > > communicate.
> >
> > I don't think this is right. I believe the difference is in
> > transmit strength only. This means that both ends have to be in the
> > 100m range class to give the extended range.
> >
> >
>
>