Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (
More info?)
Thanks for both of your replies.
I have tackled the camera owner's manual with more diligence now and
have found a couple of re-assuring clues"
It does follow the memory card folder structure that Apple requires
(starting with a DCIM folder with internal folders for photos)
It describes the transfer mode as switching between a "data storage
device" and a remote camera. While "data storage device" is not quite
as exact as the wording "mass storage device", I think I will assume
they are talking about the same thing.
I just phoned Konica Minolta (Canada)'s tech support and tried to get
him to confirm conclusively that this camera did, indeed, conform as a
"mass storage device" but the most I could get out of him was that it
acted like an external drive. His suggestion was to get an SD card
reader and plug that into Apple's camera connector (connected to the
iPod) but that means unplugging and plugging the SD card a lot. Then
you get into a whole new debate about which will last longer - the SD
card contacts (on card and in the camera) or the tiny USB connectors.
At least the card reader option would give another possible way of
making the iPod serve if the direct connection was found not to work.
Local Apple dealers don't seem to bother with demo models of the iPod
and camera adapter and my daughter is away travelling with the camera,
in any case, so testing beforehand is not an option.
Dave
ASAAR wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:38:30 GMT, junktin wrote:
>
>
>>Can anyone offer any insite, experience or educated guesses (see how
>>desparate I am?) as to whether this combination is likely to work?
>
>
> I missed this part of your msg. in my other reply. In case it
> wasn't clear, my guess it that the combination will work since the
> protocol used by the camera to transfer files to the computer works
> only when the camera sets the USB port to "Mass Storage device"
> mode.
>