Hello everyone, So...
"IN REGARDS TO MULTIPLE DISPLAYS"; I want to run 3 Monitors at minimum 1920 x 1080 each , should I?
Get a GTX 670 FTW 4GB at the cost of $484? (and keep my warrantee)
OR, get a GTX 680 Stock for $500, and overclock to make up for vram.
--- I know there are pros of each over the other, and that the performance of the GTX 680 is around 5-10% faster than the 670. But, I know VRAM is important when running multiple displays. Yet in the grand scheme of things, is buying a 670 overclocked to as powerful as a 680, but with 4GB of Vram BETTER (as far as FPS at 5760 x 1080 and price/performance), or is one 680 OVERCLOCKED as F*CK going to yeild me similar or better results?
My selfish, brag hungry heart wants a 680, yet am not willing to spend near $700 for one with 4GB vram if neccessary. And settling for 1 monitor is not an option. I appreciate all responses. Even the un-constructive ones. Although, less than the constructive ones.
"IN REGARDS TO MULTIPLE DISPLAYS"; I want to run 3 Monitors at minimum 1920 x 1080 each , should I?
Get a GTX 670 FTW 4GB at the cost of $484? (and keep my warrantee)
OR, get a GTX 680 Stock for $500, and overclock to make up for vram.
--- I know there are pros of each over the other, and that the performance of the GTX 680 is around 5-10% faster than the 670. But, I know VRAM is important when running multiple displays. Yet in the grand scheme of things, is buying a 670 overclocked to as powerful as a 680, but with 4GB of Vram BETTER (as far as FPS at 5760 x 1080 and price/performance), or is one 680 OVERCLOCKED as F*CK going to yeild me similar or better results?
My selfish, brag hungry heart wants a 680, yet am not willing to spend near $700 for one with 4GB vram if neccessary. And settling for 1 monitor is not an option. I appreciate all responses. Even the un-constructive ones. Although, less than the constructive ones.