Ok, what the crap? Why is every site doing this test just randomly out of RAM for the P4 and Athlon systems?
And benchmarks aside, i find it funny that they say this:
"The total price for the Opteron-based system – if you could actually buy a 144, was $1990 (if we assume Opteron 244 pricing, which is slightly more), compared to $1840 for the P4-based system, and $1505 for the Athlon one. Note that this is with 1GB of RAM on all systems and a pair of SATA drives for a RAID array."
Well, i'm glad the P4 and Athlon systems were tested with the 1 GB of RAM so that the benchmarks would correspond with the pricing. Oh WAIT....
Ok, griping aside...
I think this is very interesting and a MUCH better look at the future A64. When the Opteron beats the P4 in a test, it barely does it. When the P4 typically beats the Opteron, it stomps it (what happend to the POV-RAY test?). Obviously, this is to be expected (as the author constantly points out, the P4 has a huge advantage due to more Mhz/Ghz), but you know, the Opteron has much more on-die cache than the P4 and possibly the A64.
So here, the A64 will come out at 2 Ghz, right? 200 Mhz above the tested Opteron. The A64 is rumored to have 1 MB of cache, but who knows.
Best case scenario:
A64 is 2.2 Ghz with 1 MB cache. It basically trades benchmarks with the 3.2 P4, while being the best on some important ones (ie, speed crown AMD). The A64 2.4 Ghz comes out with the Prescott launch (Prescott at 3.4). Prescott and A64 trade benchmarks again, until Windows 64 comes out and the A64 gets an outright lead. Intel fights back and this continues for at least another couple years with both companies slowly increasing Ghz and handing the speed crown back and forth.
That doesn't sound so bad. IMHO if anyone predicts a better scenario than that, they have their head in the sand. Thoughts?
I'm just your average habitual smiler =D