Sick of the shitty performance im getting.
Tags:
Last response: in Systems
so, i bought an fx-8120 cause it was cheap, but now a few months alter i just cant stand the performance in every game: dota 2, guild wars 2, bf3 etc. etc.
My specs are:
fx-8120 @ 4.0ghz cooler by hyper 212 evo
gtx 560 OC asus directcu2 top
corsair vengeance 8gb
990fxa-ud3 mobo
corsair gs 600 (600w psu)
corsair force gt 90gb
bitfenix merc beta case
Now, should i get:
1) A better case, a better cooler and OC my CPU more + get a 7970(?)
2) A better CPU, skip the case and the cooler and get a nice gpu upgrade 7870(?)
The only thing i love about the fx-8120 is its multitasking capabilitys, i love to stream my gaming content on twitch.tv so its a great advantage of having an fx-8120. Can a 2500k handle that + gaming ? how far can i OC my cpu with that case and hyper 212 evo ?
give me suggestions please
My specs are:
fx-8120 @ 4.0ghz cooler by hyper 212 evo
gtx 560 OC asus directcu2 top
corsair vengeance 8gb
990fxa-ud3 mobo
corsair gs 600 (600w psu)
corsair force gt 90gb
bitfenix merc beta case
Now, should i get:
1) A better case, a better cooler and OC my CPU more + get a 7970(?)
2) A better CPU, skip the case and the cooler and get a nice gpu upgrade 7870(?)
The only thing i love about the fx-8120 is its multitasking capabilitys, i love to stream my gaming content on twitch.tv so its a great advantage of having an fx-8120. Can a 2500k handle that + gaming ? how far can i OC my cpu with that case and hyper 212 evo ?
give me suggestions please
More about : sick shitty performance
Try something else.... disable 1 core of each module of your CPU and see how it performs
Edit: in case you didn't understand.... the FX 8120 has 4 modules... in each module there are 2 cores, what you wanna do is block/supress/disable/leave unused one core of each module.
DO NOT disable two modules instead of disabling one core of each one.
Btw.... a 7970 is a kick ass GPU
your GTX560 is definitely holding you back
Edit: in case you didn't understand.... the FX 8120 has 4 modules... in each module there are 2 cores, what you wanna do is block/supress/disable/leave unused one core of each module.
DO NOT disable two modules instead of disabling one core of each one.
Btw.... a 7970 is a kick ass GPU
your GTX560 is definitely holding you backRelated ressources
- Dell is just a shitty , unethical, inefficient company - Forum
- Dell is just a shitty , unethical, inefficient company - Forum
- I'm getting sick of prices! - Forum
- I'm sick and tired of ATI bashing nowadays.... - Forum
- Sick of : Its 23:59:59 5/13/07 and Im tired of waiting 2900 - Forum
Consider getting a second GTX 560 and going SLI. I did that with my phenom X6 on that same motherboard and the difference was very impressive.
You will be cutting it kind of close with that power supply but That's the route I would look into.
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1646...
No "micro-stuttering" for me either.
You will be cutting it kind of close with that power supply but That's the route I would look into.
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1646...
No "micro-stuttering" for me either.
cheti said:
nah cause it doesent seem logical to me
turning off 4 out of 8 cores should give me more performance ?Oh god.... OH GOD.... buddy, do you even know how the architecture of the FX chips works? have you seen the diagrams? do you know how a program utilizes the system resources??? just freaking do it and compare your performance.
Quote:
You might be surprised. Disable one core per module to eliminate resource sharing (letting the still active core of each module get a significant performance per Hz boost while cutting power consumption by 30-40%) and overclocking the CPU and CPU/NB freuqneyc (increases the L3 cache frequency) on the FX-8120 and the FX-8150 can make them able to compete with the K edition i5s. Doing the same with this FX-8350 might let it be able to top Intel in lightly threaded performance until Haswell launches and even compete with the quad core LGA 1155 i7s in highly threaded performance with this *mod* and beat them without it.It might actually be one of the best things around if used properly.
idroid said:
just do it, you have nothing to lose, you might not understand why the performance goes up but i do, what i quoted makes a lot of sense from a programmers point of view.yeah for some reason i missed the quote but it does make a little sense to me now since 2 cores are sharing the resources of 1 module.
anyways, ill be doing it soon and then comparing the stuff
okay i did it, i have a gigabyte mobo so the bios is iffy but i tihnk i did it right, i could disable each core individually so there was an option to enable which referred to enabling only one core per computing unit so i just enabled that feature and now task manager shows 4 cores.
guild wars 2 fps seems to be pretty much the same (if not even worse). gonna check dota2 now.
guild wars 2 fps seems to be pretty much the same (if not even worse). gonna check dota2 now.
cheti said:
okay i did it, i have a gigabyte mobo so the bios is iffy but i tihnk i did it right, i could disable each core individually so there was an option to enable which referred to enabling only one core per computing unit so i just enabled that feature and now task manager shows 4 cores.guild wars 2 fps seems to be pretty much the same (if not even worse). gonna check dota2 now.
Download this: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1692/S.T.A.L.K.E.R... run that benchmark with the cores enabled/disabled and post your results.
4cores:
http://www.upload.ee/image/2648124/4core.png
8cores:
http://www.upload.ee/image/2648127/8core.png
as the 4cores seemed to have better fps in dota2 for example, it seriously took down the streaming performance (fx-8120 just rocks, when i stream games, thats the only thing i like about it basically
)
http://www.upload.ee/image/2648124/4core.png
8cores:
http://www.upload.ee/image/2648127/8core.png
as the 4cores seemed to have better fps in dota2 for example, it seriously took down the streaming performance (fx-8120 just rocks, when i stream games, thats the only thing i like about it basically
) cheti said:
4cores:http://www.upload.ee/image/2648124/4core.png
8cores:
http://www.upload.ee/image/2648127/8core.png
as the 4cores seemed to have better fps in dota2 for example, it seriously took down the streaming performance (fx-8120 just rocks, when i stream games, thats the only thing i like about it basically
)lol, nothing that a i5 3570k won't beat
Smeg45 said:
ROFL, buying a CPU, then disabling bits of it. Are you listening to yourself idroid? buddy.... golden rule of most forums: don't talk if you don't have proof of what you're saying... please don't
i COULD explain why there is a performance gain by disabling those cores but i am too focking tired right now.... i must sleep.
Related ressources:
- ForumMy first post.... and I'm sick of it!
- ForumShitty DACs revisited
- ForumIm sick of the AMD vs. Intel benchmarks. Please help.
- ForumRadeon 5970 Performance Issues
- ForumI'm done with ATI.
- ForumIM DONE WITH THE R600 BS!
- ForumATI fanboys screaming in fear.. I'm BACK!
- ForumCrossfire Lowers Performance ?
- ForumSick of My LG1366 Setup! New Build.
- ForumHelp Building $700 Gaming PC
- ForumNew Build - High Performance Image Editing System
- ForumLower than expected performance with GTX 680??
- ForumQuestion about gaming PC performance.
- ForumI'm having problems with multimedia performance under heavy load.
- ForumHelp getting cost down
- More resources
Read discussions in other Systems categories
!
sli isnt an option for me atm