Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

RAID is it worth the extra money?

Last response: in Storage
Share
Anonymous
a b G Storage
September 16, 2001 8:09:01 PM

Hello,

I have just ordered this system:

1.2 athlon (266 fsb)
(2) 40 gb ata100 maxtor hardrives 7200 rpm
64 mg geforce 2 gts pro
256 pc 2100 ddr sdram
soundblaster live!
ECS k7S5a (SiS 735)

the rest doesn't matter.

My question is, is it worth it to spend the extra 100 or so to get RAID controller hardware. I realize it will speed up the rate of transfer from my harddrives, but will it be overkill? Will the extra rate of transfer make much of a difference, this machine will be a gaming machine

If you think it is worth spending that extra money, please leave the name of a good RAID controller

More about : raid worth extra money

September 16, 2001 8:42:29 PM

Well, for games, it's overkill. For office apps, and for Photo editing and video editing, it's worth it.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
September 16, 2001 8:45:52 PM

I don't think it's overkill for games, I mean in Deus Ex for instance under Win 98 SE it takes like 2 mins. to save a game b/c of teh hard drive.

When I rule the world, Apple will only mean the fruit.
Related resources
September 17, 2001 3:39:16 AM

"is it worth it?"

a very subjective viewpoint.
raid will greatly speed up pure transfer rates.
very useful for loading alot of stuff.
seeking is still the same.

personally im very happy with my single ata100 ibm 60GXP.
very efficient for what i do.
sure i could go raid with my onboard controller, but what would cost me another drive, to to mention time & hastle setting it up properly.
i play games
sure the net
write stuff
rip mp3's
watch movies
and edit wav files

for me, its not worth the dough, specially as i need a new monitor soon.

In memory of the 90+ Auzzies missing in the WTC disaster. An attack that has changed the world.
September 17, 2001 4:52:38 AM

good point. also too, a game is only going to load so fast. i've played q3 many times on a single ata100 drive and i don't see how it could be much faster (noticably). but if raid is another braggin point for you then go for it.

always with one shoe untied and never finding the other.
September 17, 2001 5:23:19 AM

yep.
raid 0 CAN reduce such times...
but u will have double the drives, the controller, more cables, and statistically a greater chance of drive failure, cauzing using a simple raid 0 with 2 drives in parallel if one dies you have lost the data on both.

i like raid 1 though (redundent drive)

In memory of the 90+ Auzzies missing in the WTC disaster. An attack that has changed the world.
Anonymous
a b G Storage
September 18, 2001 1:16:25 AM

If you have already bought the two Maxtors than this doesn't matter. I think that storage space is more important than storage speed. I would spend the money on one large hard drive.

As far as IDE RAID goes - a good friend of mine just installed the IWILL SIDE RAID controller. He edits alot of multitrack audio and has seen a noticable improvement in speed in his Audio apps but no improvement in some other apps.

Pally 1.2@1.4 (10x140)
MSI K7 Master
Swiftech MC462
Crucial 256 DDR x1
September 18, 2001 3:13:31 AM

RAID is also great for video editing and such, u ever try playing 1600x1200 uncompressed frames? It's nuts.

Your brain: PC
You brain on drugs: Mac
!