Thermaltake water 2.0 performer or FRIO OCK

Tags:

Last response: January 25, 2013 4:38 PM in Components

rainbueza

January 20, 2013 1:29:18 AM

Hi, I just want to ask which of these two cpu cooler is better. I do not have plans on purchasing a corsair brand water cooler because Thermaltake is my personal favorite brand. ^_^

so what do you think. my processor is the AMD FX 8350 at stock speed of 4.0 ghz and I am not going to overclock it.

my current cooler which is the coolermaster s524 gemin II seems not enough as my processor reaches 58c+ while playing bf3 online.

Thanks for the help guyz.

More about : thermaltake water performer frio ock

| E-mail me updates
| Report abuse

Reply to rainbueza

phate1337

January 23, 2013 7:58:03 AM

just go with the frio, the watercooler is overkill to be honest, plus the frio is pretty good looking (depending on the colour you choose of course). the frio is plenty enough for what you are doing with it, but make sure you have the case clearance for it, it's a big piece of kit.

| Report abuse

Reply to phate1337

maximuscesar

January 25, 2013 4:16:39 PM

I was with the exactly same doubt so I searched a lot of reviews and figured out that In fact Frio is BETTER than the Water 2.0 performer!

| Report abuse

Reply to maximuscesar

Motopsychojdn

January 25, 2013 4:38:08 PM

Most allinones can be out-performed by aircoolers and despite your love of the brand, TT watercooling kit is very low level and put bluntly, crap.
You are much better served with the frio here
Moto

| Report abuse

Reply to Motopsychojdn

Ask the community

Related ressources:

Read discussions in other Components categories

- Cougar
- DeepCool
- Enermax