According to THG's latest comparison of chipsets, Springdale TIES the Canterwood, making this piece of crap at the moment a real joke. Any bloke who pays more than 50$ more for Canterwood for this supposed joke of a performance boost, needs a serious treatment. The figures of the benchmarks, show that the P4P800 is on par if not 0.1% (and I'm being GENEROUS HERE!) less performing.
I don't understand this, is Canterwood seriously unoptimized and has no real chipset driver that is appropriate?
In any case, AMD has absolutely lost, there is little reason now to buy any, when the 2.4 800 WITH HT is a deal-blower. They are seriously powerful chips, the 2.8 was even outrunning the old 3.06GHZ sometimes! That and a cheap Springdale will really kick some serious butt.
And I'm just sad for Canterwood owners and future buyers (DON'T!), since they just got royally screwed by paying so much more, when you get the same features.
--
If I could see the Matrix, I'd tell you I am only seeing 0s inside your head! :tongue:
I don't understand this, is Canterwood seriously unoptimized and has no real chipset driver that is appropriate?
In any case, AMD has absolutely lost, there is little reason now to buy any, when the 2.4 800 WITH HT is a deal-blower. They are seriously powerful chips, the 2.8 was even outrunning the old 3.06GHZ sometimes! That and a cheap Springdale will really kick some serious butt.
And I'm just sad for Canterwood owners and future buyers (DON'T!), since they just got royally screwed by paying so much more, when you get the same features.
--
If I could see the Matrix, I'd tell you I am only seeing 0s inside your head! :tongue: