Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
It's lame that digicam manufacturers provide kits with 16MB memory cards
and a NiMH battery charger.
Most people who have joined the modern technological age (in which we live
today ;-) already have a battery charger, and often they have a better one
than the manufacturers provide in these kits.
Whereas the 16MB card they include in the kit holds 3 high-res images,
or 0 (zero) raw images. That's downright silly.
Why don't they give an option of larger memory card with no battery charger?
For instance, a 256MB xD card costs about $40 while the Fuji BC-NH02
with two 2000 mAh AA NiMH batteries costs about $39.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Bill Tuthill" <can@spam.co> wrote in message news:432f6853@news.meer.net...
> It's lame that digicam manufacturers provide kits with 16MB memory cards
> and a NiMH battery charger.
>
> Most people who have joined the modern technological age (in which we live
> today ;-) already have a battery charger, and often they have a better one
> than the manufacturers provide in these kits.
>
> Whereas the 16MB card they include in the kit holds 3 high-res images,
> or 0 (zero) raw images. That's downright silly.
>
> Why don't they give an option of larger memory card with no battery
> charger?
>
> For instance, a 256MB xD card costs about $40 while the Fuji BC-NH02
> with two 2000 mAh AA NiMH batteries costs about $39.
>
I'd rather they include neither, unless the charger is for a proprietery
battery. Anything extra not manufactured/assembled by the OEM is going to
cost more to include than if you buy it on your own.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
In article <43304109@news.meer.net>, Bill Tuthill <can@spam.co> wrote:
> My main point is that including a 16 MB memory card
> with a 6 to 9 Mp camera is downright insulting,
> and a waste of a memory card.
Right after I got my 10D, Canon sent me a free memory card. It was made
by Lexar, so it's top quality, but it was only 96MB. For someone who
shoots RAW, as I do, a card that will store 14 pics ain't real useful.
But, the price was right.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
<tlai909@visto.com> wrote in message
news:1127185098.415077.112600@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Most dSLRs don't include anything... mem or chargers...
>
> T.
>
Canon DSLRs all include a charger. I don't remember if mine had a card or
not. To me, the only reason they would include a small memory card is so
you can check the operation of the camera. Other than that, yes it's pretty
useless.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Mark B. wrote:
> <tlai909@visto.com> wrote in message
> news:1127185098.415077.112600@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Most dSLRs don't include anything... mem or chargers...
>>
>> T.
>>
>
> Canon DSLRs all include a charger. I don't remember if mine had a
> card or not. To me, the only reason they would include a small
> memory card is so you can check the operation of the camera. Other
> than that, yes it's pretty useless.
>
> Mark
My Canon dSLRs did include a charger, did not include a memory card
that I remember.
All my pocketable P&S cameras (Canon S500, Dimmidge Xs) included both.
My more-big P&S (Nikon 995, 5000, 5700, 8700) included charger but no
card that I remember.
Looks to me as if the idea is to make the simpler ones as simple as
possible, obviating the need to purchase a card to start getting
results. Seems appropriate to me.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.