Digital audio group?

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Richard Evans wrote:

> Can anyone point me to a group for discussion of digital audio? I was
> subscribed to one once, but have forgotten the name and can't find it
> again.

rec.audio.pro and other rec.audio.* groups?

--
znark

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Richard Evans" <infodex@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news eb1j1d4autp5mmol3b3nr6kgmmaku8psq@4ax.com...
> Can anyone point me to a group for discussion of digital audio? I was
> subscribed to one once, but have forgotten the name and can't find it
> again.

Even I can plug the word 'audio' into my newsgroup list and get 8 zillion
results.
However, it's the nature of the profession nowadays that rec.audio.pro may
provide you with more digital than analogue satisfaction.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Gormless" <simeon@gormless.com> wrote:

>
>"Richard Evans" <infodex@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news eb1j1d4autp5mmol3b3nr6kgmmaku8psq@4ax.com...
>> Can anyone point me to a group for discussion of digital audio? I was
>> subscribed to one once, but have forgotten the name and can't find it
>> again.
>
>Even I can plug the word 'audio' into my newsgroup list and get 8 zillion
>results.

Except I was looking for specifically the one I had previously
subscribed to. Never did find it.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Richard Evans" <infodex@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:kpj3j1te2ood93f0unt8g3l6ig8deu4t01@4ax.com...
> "Gormless" <simeon@gormless.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Richard Evans" <infodex@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> >news eb1j1d4autp5mmol3b3nr6kgmmaku8psq@4ax.com...
> >> Can anyone point me to a group for discussion of digital audio? I was
> >> subscribed to one once, but have forgotten the name and can't find it
> >> again.
> >
> >Even I can plug the word 'audio' into my newsgroup list and get 8 zillion
> >results.
>
> Except I was looking for specifically the one I had previously
> subscribed to. Never did find it.
>
You presumably didn't, either, find the second half of my post, which gave
you a good one of several very relevant answers.
Erm, BTW, is there some way in which we were expected to mentally divine
which one you were previously subscribed to?

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Can't you search on google groups for one of your old posts?