zoofish

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2012
53
0
18,630
Okay, so I previously asked this question sort of, but I still have not upgraded my cpu. So I want to ask the question again with updated information. Because I have access to a Microcenter I can get the cpu's a little cheaper.

Which cpu would be the best for all around games now and in the future(supposing I upgrade my gpu to something equivalent to a GTX 690) and everyday tasks(internet and such):

-FX-8350 - $189
-I5 2500k - $139
-I5 3570k - $189
-I7 3770k - $229

I have an M5A99x Evo, FX 8120 and GTX 670.

I will also overclock each slightly (0.4-0.5 Ghz)

Which is the best upgrade from my FX 8120 (best bang for my bucK)?
 

TheGreatHoylando

Honorable
Jan 21, 2013
170
0
10,710
I agree with ChilledGrease. You don't need to bay the extra 75 for Hyperthreading on the i7, games don't use it and there's a virtually 0% difference in gaming between the i7 3570K and the i7 3770K. But if you prefer AMD, I'd go FX 8350, that does have Hyperthreading. All the processors provide a good overclock :)

Regards,
Dan.
 

acerace

Distinguished
Jan 1, 2011
970
0
19,060
No no no, scratch that. Get the 8350. It is better than 3570K in almost everything.

Also, by getting the 8350, you don't have to upgrade your platform. You save what, 200-300$? 8350 is a no brainer for the most bang for the buck, in your case at least.
 

zoofish

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2012
53
0
18,630
Well if I went with the 2500k and the MSI Z77A-G45 it would total $250 @ Microcenter.
Given I could sell my motherboard and cpu for at least $200, it would be a $50 upgrade. If I go with the FX 8350, it $190 and if I sell my FX 8120 for $100, thats a $90 upgrade.
 

zoofish

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2012
53
0
18,630

So other than the I5 3570k being newer with better integrated graphics, there is barely a difference. Could I overclock the 2500k to equal the performance of the 3570k?
 

TheGreatHoylando

Honorable
Jan 21, 2013
170
0
10,710
That's the only difference I'm aware of and the i5 2500k is actually .1 ghz slower stock speed but you and overclock it a lot, so yeah it would equal the 3570K. The 3570K just has better support, efficiency etc. The 2500K is still an excellent CPU and an excellent choice :)
 

Opaz1ka

Honorable
Dec 18, 2012
75
0
10,640

Whaaaaa.... the 3570k easily outperforms the 8350, ESPECIALLY in gaming, add that to its waaaay lower TDP and intel quicksync? i would say that the 3570k is a better "bang for your buck"
 

TheGreatHoylando

Honorable
Jan 21, 2013
170
0
10,710

As the owner of an i5 3570K, I agree with you totally. Intel make nice refined processors, AMD seem to put more cores in to keep up with Intel...
 


Uhm, did you really mean to say that the FX 8350 supports hyperthreading? Because that's in no way correct.

OP, it comes down to the i5-3570k or the FX 8350. Both are great chips, but I'd say the i5 is better for gaming.

However, it looks like you already have a decent processor, which means neither of these are going to be huge upgrades. Since that's the case, do the obvious: Pick up an aftermarket cooler for $30 and overclock that SOB. (Which you should do with the upgrade anyways.)
 


Sorry kid, but you're already an established troll.

(For those who don't know, there's no point (for gamers or average users) in buying a MODERN i7 over an i5 - the only difference is hyperthreading, which games don't support. The i7 is simply a waste of money.)
 

TheGreatHoylando

Honorable
Jan 21, 2013
170
0
10,710

Thank you DarkSable, someone with more sense than this guy, he's getting cocky with his i7 :)
 

acerace

Distinguished
Jan 1, 2011
970
0
19,060


Well, the 8350 beats the 2500K in everything. The $40 more is very worth it. FX 8350 is a VERY capable all-in-one CPU. Even though the 8350 might slack a bit in gaming, the 3570K faster only a little bit. Not worth the platform upgrade.

With what you have now, a simple BIOS update, and you're good to go. Only have to buy the CPU, nothing more.