Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > JPEG image with wrong dimension

JPEG image with wrong dimension

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - JPEG image with wrong dimension

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Hi all,
here a challenge for who wants help me..
I have a jpg pic of 700 KB..
When I open it I see the image with 160x120 pixels
PhotoPaint tell me the image is 56 KB sized (!)
What is wrong ?
Where is the image with 1920x1440 pixels ??

Thank you in advance
Bye
Alberto

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Alberto wrote:

> here a challenge for who wants help me..
> I have a jpg pic of 700 KB..
> When I open it I see the image with 160x120 pixels
> PhotoPaint tell me the image is 56 KB sized (!)
> What is wrong ?
> Where is the image with 1920x1440 pixels ??

For some reason or another, Photopaint is apparently displaying the
embedded EXIF thumbnail instead of the actual image. EXIF thumbnails, as
created by modern digital still cameras, typically have a resolution of
160×120 pixels. (If that's so, it's bit curious situation though. If
PhotoPaint cannot properly handle images with EXIF thumbnails, you're
going to have similar problems with just about all images taken with
digital still cameras.)

Try opening the problematic JPEG image in Exifer and see if it has an
EXIF thumbnail in addition to the actual image:
<http://www.friedemann-schmidt.com/software/exifer/>. If it does, you
could try making a backup copy and removing the thumbnail. This can be
done either in Exifer itself, or with a tool called "jhead"
<http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/jhead/>, or with some similar utility.
After having done that, maybe the load actual image will load in
PhotoPaint. Worth trying, anyway.

--
znark

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Alberto wrote:
> Hi all,
> here a challenge for who wants help me..
> I have a jpg pic of 700 KB..
> When I open it I see the image with 160x120 pixels
> PhotoPaint tell me the image is 56 KB sized (!)
> What is wrong ?
> Where is the image with 1920x1440 pixels ??
>
> Thank you in advance
> Bye
> Alberto

I already answered your question in rec.photo.digital.zlr

David

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Thnak you very much for your help..
I'll try to follow your advises soon
Thanks again
Alberto


Jukka Aho wrote:
> Alberto wrote:
>
> > here a challenge for who wants help me..
> > I have a jpg pic of 700 KB..
> > When I open it I see the image with 160x120 pixels
> > PhotoPaint tell me the image is 56 KB sized (!)
> > What is wrong ?
> > Where is the image with 1920x1440 pixels ??
>
> For some reason or another, Photopaint is apparently displaying the
> embedded EXIF thumbnail instead of the actual image. EXIF thumbnails, as
> created by modern digital still cameras, typically have a resolution of
> 160×120 pixels. (If that's so, it's bit curious situation though. If
> PhotoPaint cannot properly handle images with EXIF thumbnails, you're
> going to have similar problems with just about all images taken with
> digital still cameras.)
>
> Try opening the problematic JPEG image in Exifer and see if it has an
> EXIF thumbnail in addition to the actual image:
> <http://www.friedemann-schmidt.com/software/exifer/>. If it does, you
> could try making a backup copy and removing the thumbnail. This can be
> done either in Exifer itself, or with a tool called "jhead"
> <http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/jhead/>, or with some similar utility.
> After having done that, maybe the load actual image will load in
> PhotoPaint. Worth trying, anyway.
>
> --
> znark

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > JPEG image with wrong dimension
Go to:

There are 513 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 gpfear won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Conrad925 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 skythra won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Ckaz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 james59 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 snarl won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 patlabor44 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Kiren won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 WookinPaNub won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 kwadams won the Uniformed badge