Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Hi all,
Yesterday I joined a group to have birthday lunch with one of the members, I
was elected to take the photos, I decided to use my digital Olympus C-7070.
Knowing that there would be a lot of available light in the restaurant I
elected to use "Flash on" rather than risk the meter being fooled by the
available light if I had the flash set on auto. To say that I was
disappointed with the results is an understatement. Sure, the flash fired
for all the shots, but there was a general lack of illumination.
The camera manual states that the flash settings are Auto, flash on/fill
flash, flash off, slow flash etc. If I want "Flash on" does this mean I
have to compensate but "turning up the wick"? I can set the camera to give
me up to 2 stops "overexposure" with the flash.
I would be most interested in any comments from others who have used flash
in this way be it with Olympus or any other brand.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Alan McGrath wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I joined a group to have birthday lunch with one of the members, I
> was elected to take the photos, I decided to use my digital Olympus C-7070.
> Knowing that there would be a lot of available light in the restaurant I
> elected to use "Flash on" rather than risk the meter being fooled by the
> available light if I had the flash set on auto. To say that I was
> disappointed with the results is an understatement. Sure, the flash fired
> for all the shots, but there was a general lack of illumination.
>
> The camera manual states that the flash settings are Auto, flash on/fill
> flash, flash off, slow flash etc. If I want "Flash on" does this mean I
> have to compensate but "turning up the wick"? I can set the camera to give
> me up to 2 stops "overexposure" with the flash.
>
> I would be most interested in any comments from others who have used flash
> in this way be it with Olympus or any other brand.
>
> Alan
Hi Alan...
Sorry to hear your shots were disappointing - been there, done that.
I *think* what happens is your camera - instead of reading ambient light
and setting itself appropriately, says to itself... hey, it's darkish
in here, but that's OK, because at the moment of exposure it'll be nice
and bright. So, it sets itself for that eventuality.
What goes really, really wrong is that in a party-ish situation the
flash doesn't do much worthwhile at all, and you end up with what you
(we) did.
My workarounds so far are two: If ambient is at all close enough for
the wide shots, I make do with what I have, and forget the flash.
The second for the wide shots is to use the a/s/m mode, force a bit of
overexposure, and take many, many varied shots at +.3, +1, +2, etc.
Hey, it's digital, there's no cost at all
Hope this is helpful, but hope even more that the pro's among us have
better ideas
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Ken Weitzel" <kweitzel@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:HpKZe.556793$s54.115590@pd7tw2no...
>
>
> Alan McGrath wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Yesterday I joined a group to have birthday lunch with one of the
>> members, I was elected to take the photos, I decided to use my digital
>> Olympus C-7070. Knowing that there would be a lot of available light in
>> the restaurant I elected to use "Flash on" rather than risk the meter
>> being fooled by the available light if I had the flash set on auto. To
>> say that I was disappointed with the results is an understatement.
>> Sure, the flash fired for all the shots, but there was a general lack of
>> illumination.
>>
>> The camera manual states that the flash settings are Auto, flash on/fill
>> flash, flash off, slow flash etc. If I want "Flash on" does this mean I
>> have to compensate but "turning up the wick"? I can set the camera to
>> give me up to 2 stops "overexposure" with the flash.
>>
>> I would be most interested in any comments from others who have used
>> flash in this way be it with Olympus or any other brand.
>>
>> Alan
>
> Hi Alan...
>
> Sorry to hear your shots were disappointing - been there, done that.
>
> I *think* what happens is your camera - instead of reading ambient light
> and setting itself appropriately, says to itself... hey, it's darkish in
> here, but that's OK, because at the moment of exposure it'll be nice
> and bright. So, it sets itself for that eventuality.
>
> What goes really, really wrong is that in a party-ish situation the flash
> doesn't do much worthwhile at all, and you end up with what you (we) did.
> >
> My workarounds so far are two: If ambient is at all close enough for the
> wide shots, I make do with what I have, and forget the flash.
>
> The second for the wide shots is to use the a/s/m mode, force a bit of
> overexposure, and take many, many varied shots at +.3, +1, +2, etc.
> Hey, it's digital, there's no cost at all >
> Hope this is helpful, but hope even more that the pro's among us have
> better ideas >
> Take care.
>
> Ken
>
Hi Ken,
Many thanks for your comments. I can see where you are coming from when
you say to forget about the flash and just use ambient. Sure I could try
that but the reason I prefer flash is to eliminate any possibility of camera
shake.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.