Santa Blabbed

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

dvus wrote:

>I happened to stumble onto my Xmas gift from the wife and it's a Sony
>DSC-P93A. Since I saw it she wants me to decide if it's what I really want
>and if not, to swap it tomorrow. I've had a Canon PowerShot A20 for years
>
>I've been looking at the Canon PowerShot A95, the Sony DSC-T3 along with a
>few others, but the choices are daunting. I like to print out 8x10's and I
>enjoy screwing around with close-up stuff and I saw the Canon had manual
>focus which can come in handy.

Most cameras are pretty good these days. I think features and design is
more important than particular brand names.

Having said that, the Canon A95 is a very good choice. It has a good
lense, lots of features including macro mode and manual focus which you
mentioned, uses 4 AA cells which makes it easy to keep running, and it
uses the common CompactFlash memory cards. I have an A75 myself (along
with an SLR), a friend has the A95, and they both perform very well.

Also, Canon cameras tend to carry over similar features and functions,
so for that reason alone, I suggest another Canon camera to keep the
learning curve at a minimum.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

Ken wrote:
> "dvus" <dven1invalid@adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:31vdahF3dncvjU1@individual.net...
>> I happened to stumble onto my Xmas gift from the wife and it's a Sony
>> DSC-P93A. Since I saw it she wants me to decide if it's what I
>> really want and if not, to swap it tomorrow. I've had a Canon
>> PowerShot A20 for years and had decent luck with it, but the
>> close-ups aren't so hot and the pics can't be blown up very much.
>>
>> I've been looking at the Canon PowerShot A95, the Sony DSC-T3 along
>> with a few others, but the choices are daunting. I like to print out
>> 8x10's and I enjoy screwing around with close-up stuff and I saw the
>> Canon had manual focus which can come in handy.
>>
>> I'd be willing to throw in another $100 or so if there's a good
>> reason.
>>
>> Anyone care to give some advice as to what is good in the 5Mpix (or
>> so) range digitals these days?
>
> I had a Sony P31 (2mp), gave it to my Dad and replaced it with a Sony
> P10 (5mp).
> I have not been happy with the picture sharpness and image noise from
> either camera. Color rendition is pretty faithful if you stick to
> programming mode and make sure
> you optimize the shot for the lighting conditions your are shooting
> in. The point and shoot mode works but you will lose a lot of good
> shots if you rely on it too heavily.
> My father recently purchased the Sony P93A to replace the P31 I gave
> him and the
> images I have seen from it are little different than the images I
> have seen from the P31 and the P10. A co-worker bought a Sony T3 last
> month and is very unhappy with it.
> You won't find a glowing recommendation from me with regards to Sony
> digital
> cameras. They may be feature rich and offer a nice compact design but
> it's the results that count and for me those results are lacking.

Thanks to those that replied with advice. I went and got the Canon A95 and
so far I'm pretty happy with the output to the degree that I've been able to
examine it, there's quite a few features to learn.

One disappointing thing is the inability of my San Disk ImageMate card
reader to work with the new San Disk 512 MByte Compact Flash memory card. It
works just fine with the 64 MByte card I've been using in the old A20, but
when I put the new card in the green "read" light comes on but I get an
error message when I try to get the images.

Anyone shed any light on this situation?

--
dvus

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

Justín Käse wrote:
> In Message-ID:<324i4sF3ik4mvU1@individual.net> posted on Sun, 12 Dec
> 2004 22:55:16 -0500, dvus wrote:
>
>> One disappointing thing is the inability of my San Disk ImageMate
>> card reader to work with the new San Disk 512 MByte Compact Flash
>> memory card. It works just fine with the 64 MByte card I've been
>> using in the old A20, but when I put the new card in the green
>> "read" light comes on but I get an error message when I try to get
>> the images.
>
> I have a SanDisk 8in1 ImageMate reader and have only used it on CF
> cards as large as 256Mb, but since I plan to obtain a gig someday,
> your comments caught my attention. Is yours the oval style that comes
> with a docking stand and uses USB?
> Model Number: SDDR-88
> Part Number: 20-90-00114

No, mine's an SDDR-75 and only accepts Compact Flash or "SM", whatever that
is. I'm guessing mine isn't USB2 but I'd have thought it'd work albeit maybe
slower than a newer one.

dvus

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

dvus wrote:
> David J Taylor wrote:
>> dvus wrote:
>> []
>>> One disappointing thing is the inability of my San Disk ImageMate
>>> card reader to work with the new San Disk 512 MByte Compact Flash
>>> memory card. It works just fine with the 64 MByte card I've been
>>> using in the old A20, but when I put the new card in the green
>>> "read" light comes on but I get an error message when I try to get
>>> the images. Anyone shed any light on this situation?
>>
>> That doesn't sound right.
>>
>> Which model of reader exactly, and have you got the latest drivers
>> for it?
>
> It's a SanDisk SDDR-75 (USB) for reading Compact Flash and one other
> type which I've never used. As for drivers, I have WinXP which
> installs the reader automatically as a mass storage device. As an
> experiment I tried the older 64 MByte card in the new camera and then
> used the reader to obtain the files without problems. The new 512
> MByte memory works fine in both my Canon A20 and A95 but I have to
> use the USB cable to the cameras to get the pix onto the PC.
>
> dvus

Well, it could be a a faulty reader - perhaps broken pin?
I agree that no drivers appear to be required for XP.

Cheers,
David

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

David J Taylor wrote:
> dvus wrote:
>> David J Taylor wrote:
>>> dvus wrote:
>>> []
>>>> One disappointing thing is the inability of my San Disk ImageMate
>>>> card reader to work with the new San Disk 512 MByte Compact Flash
>>>> memory card. It works just fine with the 64 MByte card I've been
>>>> using in the old A20, but when I put the new card in the green
>>>> "read" light comes on but I get an error message when I try to get
>>>> the images. Anyone shed any light on this situation?
>>>
>>> That doesn't sound right.
>>>
>>> Which model of reader exactly, and have you got the latest drivers
>>> for it?
>>
>> It's a SanDisk SDDR-75 (USB) for reading Compact Flash and one other
>> type which I've never used. As for drivers, I have WinXP which
>> installs the reader automatically as a mass storage device. As an
>> experiment I tried the older 64 MByte card in the new camera and then
>> used the reader to obtain the files without problems. The new 512
>> MByte memory works fine in both my Canon A20 and A95 but I have to
>> use the USB cable to the cameras to get the pix onto the PC.
>>
> Well, it could be a a faulty reader - perhaps broken pin?
> I agree that no drivers appear to be required for XP.

Possibly, but then why is it ok with USB 1.1 cards?

--
dvus

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

dvus wrote:
[]
> Possibly, but then why is it ok with USB 1.1 cards?

What do you mean by this? You can read 512MB if you plus the reader into
a USB 1.1 port? As Wolfgang said, the CF cards are neither USB 1.0, 1.1
or 2.0.

David

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

David J Taylor wrote:
> dvus wrote:
> []
>> Possibly, but then why is it ok with USB 1.1 cards?
>
> What do you mean by this? You can read 512MB if you plus the reader
> into a USB 1.1 port? As Wolfgang said, the CF cards are neither USB
> 1.0, 1.1 or 2.0.

Ok, then I guess the question becomes "Why will my older reader read 256 Mb
cards but not 512 Mb cards?"

I suppose it may have been built unable to address over 256 Mb, if I could
find the "manual" that came with it I might be able to verify this. Or, it
could be a faulty pin, as WW suggested, however it seems the chances of
losing only the pin(s) that allow addressing higher capacity cards seems
remote.

--
dvus

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

Bill wrote:
> dvus wrote:
>> David J Taylor wrote:
>>> dvus wrote:
>>> []
>>>> Possibly, but then why is it ok with USB 1.1 cards?
>>>
>>> What do you mean by this? You can read 512MB if you plus the reader
>>> into a USB 1.1 port? As Wolfgang said, the CF cards are neither USB
>>> 1.0, 1.1 or 2.0.
>>
>> Ok, then I guess the question becomes "Why will my older reader read
>> 256 Mb cards but not 512 Mb cards?"
>>
>> I suppose it may have been built unable to address over 256 Mb, if I
>> could find the "manual" that came with it I might be able to verify
>> this. Or, it could be a faulty pin, as WW suggested, however it
>> seems the chances of losing only the pin(s) that allow addressing
>> higher capacity cards seems remote.
>
> I believe it's an addressing problem. Some of the older readers didn't
> anticipate the need for greater than 256mb cards. Some cameras can't
> read SD cards that are 512+mb.

As I posted elsewhere, an answer from SanDisk expresses an incompatibility
situation. They said:

"We have seen some problems with our Newer Cards not reading correctly in
the SDDR-75. (Extreme) (Ultra2) (All new Cards) These newer cards are much
faster then our older cards and the reader may be having problems reading
these faster cards."

Guess I'm screwed with the SDDR-75.

dvus

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.point+shoot (More info?)

David J Taylor wrote:
> dvus wrote:
>> Bill wrote:
>>> dvus wrote:
>>>> David J Taylor wrote:
>>>>> dvus wrote:
>>>>> []
>>>>>> Possibly, but then why is it ok with USB 1.1 cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean by this? You can read 512MB if you plus the
>>>>> reader into a USB 1.1 port? As Wolfgang said, the CF cards are
>>>>> neither USB 1.0, 1.1 or 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, then I guess the question becomes "Why will my older reader
>>>> read 256 Mb cards but not 512 Mb cards?"
>>>>
>>>> I suppose it may have been built unable to address over 256 Mb, if
>>>> I could find the "manual" that came with it I might be able to
>>>> verify this. Or, it could be a faulty pin, as WW suggested,
>>>> however it seems the chances of losing only the pin(s) that allow
>>>> addressing higher capacity cards seems remote.
>>>
>>> I believe it's an addressing problem. Some of the older readers
>>> didn't anticipate the need for greater than 256mb cards. Some
>>> cameras can't read SD cards that are 512+mb.
>>
>> As I posted elsewhere, an answer from SanDisk expresses an
>> incompatibility situation. They said:
>>
>> "We have seen some problems with our Newer Cards not reading
>> correctly in the SDDR-75. (Extreme) (Ultra2) (All new Cards) These
>> newer cards are much faster then our older cards and the reader may
>> be having problems reading these faster cards."
>>
>> Guess I'm screwed with the SDDR-75.
>>
>> dvus
>
> Well, at least the good news is that a new reader is unlikely to
> break the bank!

Yup, you're right, I went and got one at Best Buy. It works fine.

--
dvus