I built my PC back in 2007 when the 8800GTX and the Dualcore Conroe CPU was king.
I have since upgraded my ram to 2gb of ram to 8gb and my evga 8800GTS to a Asus DirectCU 5850 and dropped in a 1tb hdd.
The only original parts left are: Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus mobo, E6600 Conroe OC'd to 3.00ghz with a 120mm cpu cooler, and my creative soundcard.
So here is my question.
About a year ago, I was aggressively trying to get my CPU as high as possible and I found out that with my configuration, I could only get it stable to 3.00ghz. Anything beyond and I have issues. It still runs all games pretty good, but I am now considering swapping it with a more powerful LGA 775 quad core. I feel that my CPU bottle necks my GPU, I want to remove the bottle neck so I can OC my GPU and get more power out of it(heard it is an amazing overclocker).
According to Asus, these are what I can use:
Core 2 Extreme QX6700(revB3,2.66GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB)
Core 2 Extreme QX6800 (rev.G0,2.93GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,4 cores)
Core 2 Extreme QX6850(revG0,3.00GHz,1333FSB,L2:2X4MB)
Core 2 Extreme X6800(2.93GHz,1066FSB,L2:4MB,revB2)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.40GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,rev.B3,4 cores)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.40GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,rev.G0,4 cores)
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (2.66GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,rev.G0,4 cores)
I am wondering what you folks would think is the best bang for the buck, or if it is even worth it at all. My plan would be to overclock it, but here is my concern. I always heard about people being able to OC their E6600's beyond what I was able to achieve. Do you guys think my mobo is the limitation, or was my CPU the issue? Would there even be that much of a difference, if say, I bought a X6800, but only could bring it to 3.00ghz?
If my mobo is the issue, I could always harvest my brothers evga 680i board if that would open up my OCing limits.
I have since upgraded my ram to 2gb of ram to 8gb and my evga 8800GTS to a Asus DirectCU 5850 and dropped in a 1tb hdd.
The only original parts left are: Asus P5N32-E SLI Plus mobo, E6600 Conroe OC'd to 3.00ghz with a 120mm cpu cooler, and my creative soundcard.
So here is my question.
About a year ago, I was aggressively trying to get my CPU as high as possible and I found out that with my configuration, I could only get it stable to 3.00ghz. Anything beyond and I have issues. It still runs all games pretty good, but I am now considering swapping it with a more powerful LGA 775 quad core. I feel that my CPU bottle necks my GPU, I want to remove the bottle neck so I can OC my GPU and get more power out of it(heard it is an amazing overclocker).
According to Asus, these are what I can use:
Core 2 Extreme QX6700(revB3,2.66GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB)
Core 2 Extreme QX6800 (rev.G0,2.93GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,4 cores)
Core 2 Extreme QX6850(revG0,3.00GHz,1333FSB,L2:2X4MB)
Core 2 Extreme X6800(2.93GHz,1066FSB,L2:4MB,revB2)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.40GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,rev.B3,4 cores)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.40GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,rev.G0,4 cores)
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (2.66GHz,1066FSB,L2:2X4MB,rev.G0,4 cores)
I am wondering what you folks would think is the best bang for the buck, or if it is even worth it at all. My plan would be to overclock it, but here is my concern. I always heard about people being able to OC their E6600's beyond what I was able to achieve. Do you guys think my mobo is the limitation, or was my CPU the issue? Would there even be that much of a difference, if say, I bought a X6800, but only could bring it to 3.00ghz?
If my mobo is the issue, I could always harvest my brothers evga 680i board if that would open up my OCing limits.