7970 Ghz Edition vs gtx 670
Tags:
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
I'm going to get a graphics card for a new computer and I was wondering if anyone knew how the performance of the GV-R797TO-3GD compares to the GTX670-DC2T-2GD5?
More about : 7970 ghz edition gtx 670
Best solution
Related ressources
- Sapphire 7970Ghz Edition 3gb vs 670 gtx - Forum
- 7970 Ghz Edition vs Gtx 670 GC Factory Overclocked 4gb Edition - Forum
- Sli 670 4gb vs 7970 crossfire ghz edition - Forum
- 670 4GB vs 7970 Ghz edition - Forum
- MSI Lightning GTX 680 2GB vs SAPPHIRE Vapor-X 7970 GHz Edition 3GB - Forum
Razec69 said:
They are about even in reality.Depending on the game you play, you may see one card win over the other. Almost every year when a new card comes out from both parties they are about the same.
One is cheaper, etc etc...
You decide, they are both really good cards.
Sorry but they are not even close at all


redeemer said:
Sorry but they are not even close at allhttp://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p520/sanjaysaini365/3b82fa1c.png
http://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p520/sanjaysaini365/d7e1ff51.png
http://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p520/sanjaysaini365/1e42a4a9.png
you're picking specific ones.... we can probably ignore 2560x1600 since most of us don't got 30" monitors...
You're also comparing a 7970 ghz edition (basically factory overclocked) to a stock GTX 680... Overclock both and we'll see where they are.
Also. Get a EVGA GTX 670 FTW (or the Asus Direct CU II model ) and they will get around the same performance as a GTX 680 but $100 cheaper.
killerhurtalot said:
you're picking specific ones.... we can probably ignore 2560x1600 since most of us don't got 30" monitors...You're also comparing a 7970 ghz edition (basically factory overclocked) to a stock GTX 680... Overclock both and we'll see where they are.
Also. Get a EVGA GTX 670 FTW (or the Asus Direct CU II model ) and they will get around the same performance as a GTX 680 but $100 cheaper.
the reason why GHZ models exist is because when AMD designed the original reference models, they purposely had it on low clock speeds so that manufactures can sell different levels of overclocked cards(normal, OC edition, GHZ are the typical 3 levels). even though GHZ is factory overclocked, it still has room to be overclocked even more. which in the end makes it very similar to a 680 in a normal 1920x1080 environment, and on its own tier on a 2560x1600 environment
the odd thing is, you are bashing on factory overclocked AMD cards, and telling OP to buy a factory overclocked Nvidia card ಠ_ಠ
Is it true that Nvidia cards have less microstutter in SLI vs AMD cards in crossfire? I'm looking to get either CFX 7970 or SLI GTX 670 in order to game at 2560 x 1440, i heard that the improved memory bandwidth of the 7970 might make it a better performer, but I really don't want microstutter, i'm really sensitive to it.
theLiminator said:
Is it true that Nvidia cards have less microstutter in SLI vs AMD cards in crossfire? I'm looking to get either CFX 7970 or SLI GTX 670 in order to game at 2560 x 1440, i heard that the improved memory bandwidth of the 7970 might make it a better performer, but I really don't want microstutter, i'm really sensitive to it.any 2 card build can suffer microstuttering. the amount visible is dependent on how sensitive the user is to frame change. Though I cant say which one is better or worse(I would assume you have to find that one guy on this forum who has both the 680 sli and 7970 xfire for his opinion which I cannot remember the name of). The only real way of killing microstutering is by capping a Max FPS, or 3 way sli/crossfire.
Get this HD 7970 for $359.99 after $70 coupon DCZ69391 apply at check out
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/ite...
If you want to get the Ghz overclock, download Ghz bios and flash it to the card and you got a Ghz edition HD 7970 with 4 free games for 370 bucks. I don't normally recommend the HD 7970 due to higher price but at this price point its a no brainer, the performance you get from the card is pretty solid as well.
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/ite...
If you want to get the Ghz overclock, download Ghz bios and flash it to the card and you got a Ghz edition HD 7970 with 4 free games for 370 bucks. I don't normally recommend the HD 7970 due to higher price but at this price point its a no brainer, the performance you get from the card is pretty solid as well.
On average, the 7970 GHz Edition is 10% faster than the GTX 670 at 1080p. It is definitely better than the 670 - ignore the Nvidia trolls saying they're the same.
![]()
It's not a huge difference, but the difference is there.
The 670 is a slightly better value (7970 GHz ed. is 10% faster for 12% more money assuming $400 670 & $450 7970 GE).
The 7970 GE should overclock pretty easily to 1200 MHz, at which point it will trade blows with overclocked GTX 680s. The 670 will overclock but cannot quite get to those performance levels (it will be a couple % slower most likely) unless you get lucky with what chip you get, and overclocking on Kepler is slightly more complicated than on the 7970.
As for microstuttering, the gap has closed a lot this generation with microstuttering - at least on the high end cards. 7970 CF has about the same level of microstutter as 680 SLI. Check out the techreport GTX 690 review for more info (they do the best work on microstuttering and gameplay smoothness):
http://techreport.com/articles.x/22890/5
It's much better than with the previous generation cards (590/6990). In this particular case, crossfire/SLI seem to be about equal in microstutter.

It's not a huge difference, but the difference is there.
The 670 is a slightly better value (7970 GHz ed. is 10% faster for 12% more money assuming $400 670 & $450 7970 GE).
The 7970 GE should overclock pretty easily to 1200 MHz, at which point it will trade blows with overclocked GTX 680s. The 670 will overclock but cannot quite get to those performance levels (it will be a couple % slower most likely) unless you get lucky with what chip you get, and overclocking on Kepler is slightly more complicated than on the 7970.
As for microstuttering, the gap has closed a lot this generation with microstuttering - at least on the high end cards. 7970 CF has about the same level of microstutter as 680 SLI. Check out the techreport GTX 690 review for more info (they do the best work on microstuttering and gameplay smoothness):
http://techreport.com/articles.x/22890/5
It's much better than with the previous generation cards (590/6990). In this particular case, crossfire/SLI seem to be about equal in microstutter.
Just checked newegg - The 7970GE is actually an equal value to the 670. IMO no reason to get the 670 if you can shell out the extra $40 for this card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
$440 for that 7970GE is an amazing deal (as amazing a deal as you can get on a $400+ graphics card anyways)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
$440 for that 7970GE is an amazing deal (as amazing a deal as you can get on a $400+ graphics card anyways)
BigMack70 said:
The 7970 GE should overclock pretty easily to 1200 MHz, at which point it will trade blows with overclocked GTX 680s.
not really,if you are going to back up by saying that you are running 7970s @1205 then i must remind you that MSi Lightning cards have beefier VRMs and usually more overclocking headroom than xfx dd.lightning series cards are top level chips with highest overclocking potential where as xfx dd is *average* custom cooled 7970.
rhyme said:
i think you should go with GTX 670. 7970 is good too. but i think if you want to game hard so go with GTX 670. because most of the games is sponsored with nvidia and updated physx will give much better performance. Nvidia gives you much quite sound and delivers much more than AMD.Physx doesn't give better performance, it adds onto the graphics on what the games does O_o, adding more to the game technically would decrease performance, hence physx being optional. And how does one judge sound, sound quality is heavily based on the speakers, and not the gpu, which will only display sound if you are using a HDMI cable which most people dont(as most people use DVI). When comparing the HD 7k series and Gtx 6xx series, both cards offer different things. Nvidia will have the option of physx, but one thing they stripped away from the gtx 6xx line which they had in the 500 line is they stripped off computing strength, so if you ever had to use a program to compute something, on average, the HD 7k series will decimate the gtx 600 series(the fermi cards of last generation is even better) which compute power is slowly going into several programs and game design.
You are comparing two differrent tier cards here. A 7970Ghz edition was made to compete with the 680. Because the 670 can reach performance up to the 680, it does not reach the same compared to the 7970 Ghz. The regular 7970 you can compare to as it will trade blows in most games. Some run better on Nvidia others on Amd.
redeemer said:
Sorry but they are not even close at allhttp://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p520/sanjaysaini365/3b82fa1c.png
http://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p520/sanjaysaini365/d7e1ff51.png
http://i1153.photobucket.com/albums/p520/sanjaysaini365/1e42a4a9.png
You pretty much proved my point. As where one card might prosper the other dips, and vice versa.
They are about the same. ABOUT the same.
Honestly you can't go wrong with either.
Also in my opinion I'd go with the 670, any that is over clocked or has an aftermarket cooler. You can match the performance of a 680 and then some.
But again either card will do you fine. Where one might prosper, it will falter elsewhere. So it doesn't matter. Just look at the games you play the most and look at benchmarks for that game.
selayan said:
You are comparing two differrent tier cards here. A 7970Ghz edition was made to compete with the 680. Because the 670 can reach performance up to the 680, it does not reach the same compared to the 7970 Ghz. The regular 7970 you can compare to as it will trade blows in most games. Some run better on Nvidia others on Amd.hellfire24 said:
not really,if you are going to back up by saying that you are running 7970s @1205 then i must remind you that MSi Lightning cards have beefier VRMs and usually more overclocking headroom than xfx dd.lightning series cards are top level chips with highest overclocking potential where as xfx dd is *average* custom cooled 7970.I had an original XFX DD BE that hit 1210/1720 MHz on 1.23Vcore and stock vmem, purchased at launch, so you can't invalidate my point by just going "oh you have Lightning edition cards". The new GHz edition chips don't need the crazy power circuitry to hit the higher clock speeds - they are better chips than the original batch in terms of what clocks they can hit on stock voltage.
Also, Lightning chips are not binned very well (or at least, are not binned for air cooling) - I have ~70% ASIC on both, and if you read reviews they are not standout overclockers. They are good but not great. They are built for stability/longer-lifetime/LN2, not for maximum air OCs (contrary to what you may expect).
Pretty much every review of a custom cooled 7970GE has it hitting 1200 MHz (give or take) without problems.
This is in addition to the data from hwbot, which has the 7970 average OC as 1215/1706 MHz. Granted you probably wouldn't get that reliably from a reference 7970, but a custom 7970 or 7970GE would have a solid chance to hit similar clocks. As always, overclocking relies a bit on luck, but it looks like GHz ed. 7970s will hit that OC often
And, unless you get an unusually high OC out of a GTX 670, it's not going to match the performance of a 7970 at those clocks.
There's about a 1% difference between the Asus GTX 670 DirectCU TOP and the 7970 Ghz. Compare to the GTX 680 at 1920x1200, the 670 is ahead by 1% and the Ghz is ahead by 2%.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edit...
Of course, the big differences are in noise levels and power consumption:
7970 Ghz: 51 Dba
Peak power: 238 watts
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edit...
Asus 670 TOP: 25 Dba
Peak power: 177 watts
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
HardOCP has done a couple reviews where they mention that SLI feels smoother than Crossfire and that Crossfire needs to attain higher FPS to get the same feeling of smoothness in the controls. Tom's Hardware verified this phenomenon and suggested that microstutter was to blame.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-geforce-stut...
And lastly, there's the Physx thing.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edit...
Of course, the big differences are in noise levels and power consumption:
7970 Ghz: 51 Dba
Peak power: 238 watts
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edit...
Asus 670 TOP: 25 Dba
Peak power: 177 watts
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
HardOCP has done a couple reviews where they mention that SLI feels smoother than Crossfire and that Crossfire needs to attain higher FPS to get the same feeling of smoothness in the controls. Tom's Hardware verified this phenomenon and suggested that microstutter was to blame.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-geforce-stut...
And lastly, there's the Physx thing.
matto17secs said:
There's about a 1% difference between the Asus GTX 670 DirectCU TOP and the 7970 Ghz. Compare to the GTX 680 at 1920x1200, the 670 is ahead by 1% and the Ghz is ahead by 2%.http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edit...
Of course, the big differences are in noise levels and power consumption:
7970 Ghz: 51 Dba
Peak power: 238 watts
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970_GHz_Edit...
Asus 670 TOP: 25 Dba
Peak power: 177 watts
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
HardOCP has done a couple reviews where they mention that SLI feels smoother than Crossfire and that Crossfire needs to attain higher FPS to get the same feeling of smoothness in the controls. Tom's Hardware verified this phenomenon and suggested that microstutter was to blame.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-geforce-stut...
And lastly, there's the Physx thing.
If power consumption is an issue, absolutely Kepler is the card to get. However, it's not like power draw is bad on Tahiti cards. 238W of peak power draw is still not very much. Same thing with PhysX - if you plan to dump a ton of time into one of the few games that actually uses PhysX a lot, then you should buy an Nvidia card. However, there aren't many games that use it to much of an affect.
Noise is a non-issue unless you're a silence freak (in which case a custom 660ti or 670 will be awesome for you). Reviews like that of the 7970GE are of a card with a reference cooler. You can't even buy a reference-cooled version on Newegg. The custom cooled models are not going to have such issues. Sure, they may be louder than the super quiet custom 670s, but they're not going to be offensively loud like the reference card reviews indicate.
HardOCP makes claims that they don't substantiate with data, and so are irrelevant. Techreport, which actually quantifies things, finds that 7970 CF is comparable to (certainly not much worse than) 680 SLI/690 in terms of smoothness. See here and following for actual data rather than random unsubstantiated claims:
http://techreport.com/articles.x/22890/5
The Tomshardware article is irrelevant to this particular point because it's for old midrange cards.
The 670 DCUII TOP isn't even purchasable on Newegg right now. I think the 670 is a tough sell over a $440 custom 7970GE like the XFX, unless you care about PhysX or are a nut about power or silence. However, if you just want the best all around performer, the 7970GE is a better option.
selayan said:
Well I need to order a card and I'm confused now loleither choice are good cards. both excel at different things the other doesn't do as well at basically on positives generally
670
Less power consumption
Adaptive Vsync and optional Physx
CUDA for certain programs
Has the advantage on Nvidia Optimization on a handful of games
Can utilize Nvidia 3D on applicable monitors
Quieter
7970 GHZ
Stream cores compute better in outside work(which was stripped from the gtx 600 series, which was built only with gaming in mind and nothing else)
Tends to have more Vram
Better on higher resolutions past 1920x1080(including better multi screen support)
Larger memory bus, reacts better on games that cripple heavily with Anti Aliasing
I'm only playing at 1920x1080. My msi 560Ti fit nicely in my Roswill Challenger. Took it out cuz it got sold and realized my cables in the case are all over the place but hopefully I can fit the 670 in there. Or the 7970. If I were to go with 7970 isn't that an inch bigger? And which 7970 would you recommend at the level of the 670 FTW nvidia?
dudewitbow said:
key question I should ask, is if you are going to aim for enthusiast overclocking past the factory OC. in this situation, I would tend to recommend the 670 FTW easily as it fits the 1920x1080 bill better, as the 7970 is more of an overclock enthusiast card in my eyes rather than stock.hellfire24 said:
@OP,before this thread becomes a "amd vs nvidia" fight,let me tell you something-both cards are powerful enough to max out any game at your native resolution with silky smooth frame rates.
a 3-8 fps difference is negligible in real world.
just go with the cheaper option.
Agreed. So the price will back to $409 hmm I guess you're right it could. I was going to wait until monday but I'm not sure. I was hoping newegg would have another deal or something.
EDIT: Spoke too soon its already back up to $409..son of a! They had a 20.00 coupon too I didn't see it either..ugh. Oh well I'll wait now.
dudewitbow said:
Physx doesn't give better performance, it adds onto the graphics on what the games does O_o, adding more to the game technically would decrease performance, hence physx being optional. And how does one judge sound, sound quality is heavily based on the speakers, and not the gpu, which will only display sound if you are using a HDMI cable which most people dont(as most people use DVI). When comparing the HD 7k series and Gtx 6xx series, both cards offer different things. Nvidia will have the option of physx, but one thing they stripped away from the gtx 6xx line which they had in the 500 line is they stripped off computing strength, so if you ever had to use a program to compute something, on average, the HD 7k series will decimate the gtx 600 series(the fermi cards of last generation is even better) which compute power is slowly going into several programs and game design.i want to mean that it will be cool and reduce noise where AMD is hotter.
Why not save some money get 660 ti it will preform well for you. ![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()
Uploaded with ImageShack.us![]()

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

7970 for sure!
7970 vs GTX660 Ti -
http://www.hwcompare.com/13146/geforce-gtx-660-ti-vs-ra...
7970 vs GTX680 -
http://www.hwcompare.com/12508/geforce-gtx-670-vs-radeo...
Just make sure you have a nice PSU and cooling system.
7970 vs GTX660 Ti -
http://www.hwcompare.com/13146/geforce-gtx-660-ti-vs-ra...
7970 vs GTX680 -
http://www.hwcompare.com/12508/geforce-gtx-670-vs-radeo...
Just make sure you have a nice PSU and cooling system.
arzbhatia said:
7970 for sure! 7970 vs GTX660 Ti -
http://www.hwcompare.com/13146/geforce-gtx-660-ti-vs-ra...
7970 vs GTX680 -
http://www.hwcompare.com/12508/geforce-gtx-670-vs-radeo...
Just make sure you have a nice PSU and cooling system.
Lol of course the 7970 is better than the 660ti. The 670 is better than the 660ti. The 7970 model is only 100 more compared to it.
Related ressources:
- ForumMSI GTX 670 PE vs . XFX 7970 Ghz Ed, or other?
- ForumASUS GTX 670 DC2T vs Sapphire 7970 Ghz Vapor-X
- ForumRadeon 7970 Ghz vs . GTX 670
- Forum7970 vapor x ghz vs 670 gtx vs 680 for 1080p gaming
- ForumSapphire HD 7970 Ghz (dual-x) vs MSI GTX 670 PE
- ForumGTX 690 vs Asus Rog Matrix Hd 7970 vs Sapphire Hd 7970 GHz edition
- ForumMSI 670 PE SLI vs XFX 7970 GHZ CrossfireX
- ForumWTS/WTT Sapphire Radeon hd 7970ghz Edition and Galaxy GTX 680 SOC
- ForumGeforce GTX 670 vs Radeon HD 7970
- Forum2 HD 7970 vs 2 GTX670 vs 2 HD7950 vs 2 GTX 660Ti vs GTX 680
- ForumHD 7970 vs GTX 670
- ForumGTX 670 FTW vs 7970 ?
- ForumGigabyte GTX 670 OC 2 gb vs Gigabytes radeon hd 7970 OC ???
- ForumHelp me put the final block [ GTX 670 vs HD 7970 ]
- ForumHD 7870
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!