Which one of these would be a better choice for gaming, and be more future proof? They are practically the same price, with the GTX 670 SuperClocked 4GB running $460 total, and the GTX 680 running between $500 - $520 (because for some reason there's like 4-5 different variations of the EVGA SuperClocked/Signature/Dual Fan/Etc to choose from).
So which of these would be a better choice, and work better/longer down the line. I know not many games today would make use of anything more than 2GB's of VRAM, but that doesn't mean it'll always be that way in the future, so the extra VRAM on the 670 could be helpful down the line.
The 680 at stock is a more powerful card though, and could be the better choice, for better performance, since, as I already said, not many games make use of more than 2GB's of VRAM, and there's no certainty that any games in the near future (< 4 years) will make use of that much VRAM either.
So what would be the better choice, given the price difference, and slight difference of VRAM vs. Stock Power?
4GB vs 2GB; 1344 Cuda Cores vs 1536 Cuda Cores; $460 vs $500
Thanks for any help!
So which of these would be a better choice, and work better/longer down the line. I know not many games today would make use of anything more than 2GB's of VRAM, but that doesn't mean it'll always be that way in the future, so the extra VRAM on the 670 could be helpful down the line.
The 680 at stock is a more powerful card though, and could be the better choice, for better performance, since, as I already said, not many games make use of more than 2GB's of VRAM, and there's no certainty that any games in the near future (< 4 years) will make use of that much VRAM either.
So what would be the better choice, given the price difference, and slight difference of VRAM vs. Stock Power?
4GB vs 2GB; 1344 Cuda Cores vs 1536 Cuda Cores; $460 vs $500
Thanks for any help!