Hi,
2 Days ago I've purchased a Core 2 Duo E8400 - 3.0 GHz (6MB Cache) from the local market. The salesman gave me a couple of options. One of them was this C2D 3.0 GHz (Which I purchased) and a couple of "Core 2 Quad" Processors with Clock Speed about 2.33 - 2.5 GHz Clock Speed. I picked the C2D 3.0 GHz, considering its Big Clock Speed and 6 MB Cache.
BUT Now I'm wondering, was it Really a Wise Decision? Is a Core 2 Quard STRONGER than Core 2 Duo, Regardless of its Clock Speed & Cache?
Should I've chosen Core 2 Quad? If yes, WHY? Or I made the Right Choice?
By the way, I've got this processor for the sole gaming purposes. I want to play games like Hitman Absolution, Assassins Creed Revelations & Assassins Creed III, NFS: The Run, NFS: Most Wanted (2012) etc.
Core 2 Duo which I got has FSB 1333, while the Core 2 Quad had FSB 1066.
Thanks.
2 Days ago I've purchased a Core 2 Duo E8400 - 3.0 GHz (6MB Cache) from the local market. The salesman gave me a couple of options. One of them was this C2D 3.0 GHz (Which I purchased) and a couple of "Core 2 Quad" Processors with Clock Speed about 2.33 - 2.5 GHz Clock Speed. I picked the C2D 3.0 GHz, considering its Big Clock Speed and 6 MB Cache.
BUT Now I'm wondering, was it Really a Wise Decision? Is a Core 2 Quard STRONGER than Core 2 Duo, Regardless of its Clock Speed & Cache?
Should I've chosen Core 2 Quad? If yes, WHY? Or I made the Right Choice?
By the way, I've got this processor for the sole gaming purposes. I want to play games like Hitman Absolution, Assassins Creed Revelations & Assassins Creed III, NFS: The Run, NFS: Most Wanted (2012) etc.
Core 2 Duo which I got has FSB 1333, while the Core 2 Quad had FSB 1066.
Thanks.