Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

FX-6200 vs FX-6300?

Last response: in CPUs
Share
March 1, 2013 11:23:39 PM

As the title says. FX-6200 vs FX-6300? which is better in performance? I will be using it to game. this plus Radeon 7850 twin frozr overclocked.

More about : 6200 6300

Best solution

a b à CPUs
March 1, 2013 11:30:01 PM

The FX-6300 is obviously better, since it's from the piledriver architecture, the FX-6200 is from the older bulldozer architecture.
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc-mac/pc-components/p...
Share
March 1, 2013 11:31:14 PM

Alright, May i ask why the FX6200 is more expensive that the 6300? Only by 1.50$ but still
Score
0
Related resources
a c 152 à CPUs
March 1, 2013 11:31:55 PM

blade2697 said:
As the title says. FX-6200 vs FX-6300? which is better in performance? I will be using it to game. this plus Radeon 7850 twin frozr overclocked.


The Bulldozer 6200 was complete crap. It couldn't beat Intel's Sandy Bridges and in most cases couldn't even beat out the Phenom II's they were suppose to replace. There is no point in getting a last generation CPU especially when it is as bad as it is. If you are going to go with AMD atleast go with the newer Piledriver.
Score
0
a b à CPUs
March 1, 2013 11:32:09 PM

blade2697 said:
Alright, May i ask why the FX6200 is more expensive that the 6300? Only by 1.50$ but still


Sometimes older cpus are more expensive than the new ones, another reason to get the FX-6300.
Score
0
a c 152 à CPUs
March 1, 2013 11:33:43 PM

blade2697 said:
Alright, May i ask why the FX6200 is more expensive that the 6300? Only by 1.50$ but still


It shouldn't be in most places like Newegg it is cheaper. If you are paying more for the Bulldozer of Piledriver you are getting ripped off.
Score
0
March 1, 2013 11:35:44 PM

Best answer selected by blade2697.
Score
0
March 1, 2013 11:35:49 PM

Thanks guys :D 
Score
0
!