Well I'll be damned.
**looks around**
Yep. This is hell alright. A SCSI card that won't detect our APEX detector. A million different SCSI cables laying around and yet <i>none</i> that can connect an old external hard drive from our SGI box to the card to test that the card even works. Strangely enough, no jumper anywhere to connect the prongs on an internal SCSI hard drive to be a single device on the chain to test that the card even works. It's one of <i>those</i> days. We have a ton of hardware, and yet somehow, we can't get any of it to play nicely together just to test a single bloody SCSI card.
Damn it, I want to know if my program, Spikey, proves that the onboard CPU and RAM of the new SCSI card will keep the data stream from crashing when it loses synchronization because of a heavy CPU load!
After all, it isn't every day that you are actually told to write a program which intentionally spikes the CPU to 100% every 10 seconds. I want to know if this deranged program actually did something useful! Argh! To think that I might have given it a smiley face icon for nothing!
He he he he he.
Seriously though, back to the actual discusion instead of my insane ranting, I thought that the Duron did have SSE. I wasn't really sure though, so I checked AMD's website on the Duron:
<A HREF="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_1200_1202^1938,00.html" target="_new">http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_1200_1202^1938,00.html</A>
They mentioned 3D Now! and MMX, but not SSE. AMD didn't mention SSE anywhere on their Duron product description, but yet they <i>did</i> on their AXP product description. (Not that I needed to look up the AXP since I already knew for certain that the AXP did support SSE, but what can I say, I wanted to make extra sure.) So I figured AMD must know better than me, and by them not mentioning SSE for the Duron, it did leave me wondering if I had just thought wrong or what. So in the end, I decided AMD must be right and made my statement accordingly to their data.
Still, I'll take your word for it and just admit that I'm wrong since I hadn't felt entirely sure about that statement in the first place anyway. Plus if both you and FatBurger endorse the Duron having SSE, then that's a pretty good endorsement. You both are two of the more 'seasoned' posters around here and often have pretty darn good data.
In the end though, really it has little bearing on my point anyway, that AMD treats their Duron <i>exactly</i> the same way that Intel is planning for the Wilty. So I still stand by my statement that AMD is <i>just</i> as guilty of hacking the performance their budget line as Intel.
To be honest, it disgusts me that either company would hack their 'budget' line <i>that</i> much just to keep it from performing as well as their professional line. But hey, you get what you pay for.
<pre><font color=orange><b>du hast den Sweater verkehrt an</b></font color=orange>
Oh my!</pre><p>