Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (
More info?)
Here Here!
Davido U.K.
"Huckleberry" <sneaker68@excite.com> wrote in message
news
4sre.802$bo1.780@fed1read06...
>
> "Paul Goodhew" <Paul.Goodhew@telstrawholesale.com> wrote in message
> news:d8lccv$2ef$1@mws-stat-syd.cdn.telstra.com.au...
>>
>> "Huckleberry" <sneaker68@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:rOpre.461$bo1.23@fed1read06...
>>> I have an AMD 1.8 2200, 1gig ram, ATI 9200 128MB, running XP Pro so
>>> according to EAgames' website I'm within their specs to play.
>>> The last thing that happens is I have a black screen with a red "2"
>> spinning
>>> and then it turn into an arrow and there is music playing in the
>> background.
>>> I have to ctrl-alt-del to get out of it and all my video setting are
>> screwed
>>> up.
>>> When my screensaver comes on now, right after trying, it has become a
>>> floating box that says "can't find compatible Direct 3D device".
>>> What gives?
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>> right. this is fairly obvious. read the release notes for the game. there
>> is
>> a list of supported graphics cards. is the 9200 graphics in that list??
>>
>> no, it's not.
>>
>> so now let's revisit the error message "can't find compatible Direct 3D
>> device".
>>
>> are things starting to get a little clearer?
>>
>> you can't expect to run the latest games on ancient technology. end of
>> story. if you don't want to spend the money to ugprade your system every
>> couple of years then buy an xbox.
>>
>>
> Man...you need to untwist your panties. I asked a simple question and as
> I said..."My comp is in spec ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN WEBSITE!" Did you
> miss that part?? Guess so. Now if there was something in the release
> notes that said differently that I'd actually read you wouldn't have
> needed to reply with your hissy fit because I wouldn't have asked the
> question. Is that computing (1+1=...)?
> Don't be such a prissy snob with these smartass comments as they don't
> help anyone. Maybe you didn't realize something but people come here to
> ask questions or are having problems within the title's subject. If you
> think that you are "above" answering basic questions and HELPING someone
> without being a snob, then don't waste your "precious intellect" on "us
> po', ancient 'puter ownin', folk".
>