Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Instead of looking for the traditional camera
accessories, companies like Canon, Nikon, etc,
should consider better quality CCDs as options
to the cheap CCD/CMOS chips they use in base
cameras. CCDs that provide better image quality,
more accurate colour, no hot pixels or fewer, etc.
In light of that, here is the CCD I suggest they
adopt:
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
RichA wrote:
> Instead of looking for the traditional camera
> accessories, companies like Canon, Nikon, etc,
> should consider better quality CCDs as options
> to the cheap CCD/CMOS chips they use in base
> cameras. CCDs that provide better image quality,
> more accurate colour, no hot pixels or fewer, etc.
> In light of that, here is the CCD I suggest they
> adopt:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5jtzn
The device you refer to is shy of 2 Mpix ... that won't fly these days, further
it is quite small at 13.4 x 9.5 mm ... aimed at the P&S market, I suppose.
CMOS has ready advantages including low heat buildup during exposure.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"Alan Browne" <alan.browne@freelunchVideotron.ca> wrote in message
news:cq48ku$4qq$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
> RichA wrote:
>
>> Instead of looking for the traditional camera
>> accessories, companies like Canon, Nikon, etc,
>> should consider better quality CCDs as options
>> to the cheap CCD/CMOS chips they use in base
>> cameras. CCDs that provide better image quality,
>> more accurate colour, no hot pixels or fewer, etc.
>> In light of that, here is the CCD I suggest they adopt:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/5jtzn >
> The device you refer to is shy of 2 Mpix ... that won't fly these days,
> further it is quite small at 13.4 x 9.5 mm ... aimed at the P&S market, I
> suppose.
>
> CMOS has ready advantages including low heat buildup during exposure.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
>
The text refers to an 11 mp sensor, the KAI-11000CM, but the sidebar is for
the KAI-2001, which is the 1.9mp you mention. I wonder what the actual
dimensions of the 11000 are?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Skip M wrote:
>><http://www.kodak.com/global/en/digital/ccd/products/interline/KAI-11000CM/indexKAI-11000CM.jhtml?id=0.1.8.4.25&lc=en>
>>should work better.
>>
>>Bart
>>
>
> Why wouldn't Kodak use this in one of their own cameras? It sounds superior
> to what they're using in the 14/n/c...
Good point. Negligeable loss of res. Possibly better performance. Although
from what I read the SLR/c and /n are doing quite well (performance wise) v. the
original 14/n. You still need to put on the A-A and microlenses to get the real
performance.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.