Maxxum 7D brochure - detailed

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

For whomever may be interested, a detailed description of the 7D is available
(24 page pdf, 3 MB) at:

http://www2.konicaminolta.de/foto/7d/dynax7d_guidebook.pdf

Yes, it is a marketing doc, of course, but it also has a pretty complete system
and accessories guide.

Cheers,
Alan


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
6 answers Last reply
More about maxxum brochure detailed
  1. Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

    Alan Browne wrote:

    >
    > For whomever may be interested, a detailed description of the 7D is
    > available (24 page pdf, 3 MB) at:
    >
    > http://www2.konicaminolta.de/foto/7d/dynax7d_guidebook.pdf
    >
    > Yes, it is a marketing doc, of course, but it also has a pretty complete
    > system and accessories guide.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Alan
    >
    >


    Thanks for passing this along Alan, it offers a short but effective
    visual example of the dreaded 1.5 crop factor of digital VF images for
    any dSLR plagued similarly.

    --
    jer
    email reply - I am not a 'ten'
  2. Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

    Jer wrote:

    > Thanks for passing this along Alan, it offers a short but effective
    > visual example of the dreaded 1.5 crop factor of digital VF images for
    > any dSLR plagued similarly.

    I'm not sure what you mean by that. The VF (viewfinder) of the Max 7D is 95% of
    the imaging area (which is a 1.5 crop v. 35mm).

    'plagued'? If the only format were 36x24mm in digital, there would be no
    affordable DSLR's for amateurs and the very many professionals who do not own or
    use full frame digital cameras. For those who want to shoot digital, the
    cropped sensors are enablers, not a plague.

    On the other side of the coin they also provide an effective longer focal
    length, without aperture loss, which is a benefit to many. At that, shooting in
    the best part of the lens is a further benefit. The only real drawback is
    shooting at very wide angles.

    http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2616953&size=lg is what a 6 MP 1.5
    cropped image can do ... in the right hands. But hey, this fellow is merely a
    respected and well published nature photog, so maybe that doesn't count.

    You can take the attitude that only 100% 36x24 is 'valid' and pay through your
    nose for it, or take the attitude that what is available at an affordable price
    works very well and work with it.

    Cheers,
    Alan.


    --
    -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
    -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
    -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
    -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  3. Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

    Alan Browne wrote:

    > Jer wrote:
    >
    >> Thanks for passing this along Alan, it offers a short but effective
    >> visual example of the dreaded 1.5 crop factor of digital VF images for
    >> any dSLR plagued similarly.
    >
    >
    > I'm not sure what you mean by that. The VF (viewfinder) of the Max 7D
    > is 95% of the imaging area (which is a 1.5 crop v. 35mm).
    >
    > 'plagued'? If the only format were 36x24mm in digital, there would be
    >

    [blush]

    I's just teasing Alan. (maybe if I bought more of those cute little
    smileys so I'd always have one handy)

    [/blush]

    I called it dreaded because of all the threads about it.


    > [....]


    --
    jer
    email reply - I am not a 'ten'
  4. Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

    Jer wrote:
    > Alan Browne wrote:

    > I's just teasing Alan. (maybe if I bought more of those cute little
    > smileys so I'd always have one handy)
    > I called it dreaded because of all the threads about it.

    Considering the Season, I'll forgive you this once.

    You're lucky ... usually I don't forgive til the beginning of a New Year.

    ;-) <- econo brand.

    Cheers,
    Alan
    --
    -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
    -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
    -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
    -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  5. Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

    This is not the Maxxum 7D. It shows as the Dynax 7D.


    "Alan Browne" <alan.browne@freelunchVideotron.ca> wrote in message
    news:cqeq6v$qku$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
    >
    > For whomever may be interested, a detailed description of the 7D is
    > available (24 page pdf, 3 MB) at:
    >
    > http://www2.konicaminolta.de/foto/7d/dynax7d_guidebook.pdf
    >
    > Yes, it is a marketing doc, of course, but it also has a pretty complete
    > system and accessories guide.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Alan
    >
    >
    > --
    > -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
    > -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
    > -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
    > -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  6. Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

    dgarcia10@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

    > This is not the Maxxum 7D. It shows as the Dynax 7D.

    Same thing. Don't top post.

    --
    -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
    -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
    -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
    -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
Ask a new question

Read More

SLR Systems Cameras