Here is a quote from the conclusion of the "behind the silicon curtain" review:
"Our benchmark results clearly prove that if Intel changes the FSB and memory clocks (to 133 MHz and 533 MHz, respectively), this will put it quite a distance ahead of its competition from AMD, as well as its own series of processors"
The benchmarks DO NOT prove this point WHAT SO EVER. The clock frequencies of all the Intel processors with the 133MHz bus are considerably higher than the currently available processors. So it only proves that the these future processors run faster than current.
To PROVE the above quotation you would have to benchmark the CPUs (with different FSB/memory) at the same clock frequencies.
McEwin
"Our benchmark results clearly prove that if Intel changes the FSB and memory clocks (to 133 MHz and 533 MHz, respectively), this will put it quite a distance ahead of its competition from AMD, as well as its own series of processors"
The benchmarks DO NOT prove this point WHAT SO EVER. The clock frequencies of all the Intel processors with the 133MHz bus are considerably higher than the currently available processors. So it only proves that the these future processors run faster than current.
To PROVE the above quotation you would have to benchmark the CPUs (with different FSB/memory) at the same clock frequencies.
McEwin