Archived from groups: alt.games.whitewolf (
More info?)
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:18:06 -0700, Stephenls <stephenls@shaw.ca>
wrote:
>Nimrod Jones wrote:
>
>> Well, in all fairness, if you're going to include Nosferatu it would be
>> quite inane to *not* have them ugly as sin and looking the way they do since
>> they take their name from, well, the film Nosferatu who kind of set the mold
>> for how they look.
>
>> Of course, they could do something really whacky like make the Nosferatu so
>> amazingly stunning that their unnatural beauty is interpretted as ugliness
>> in the mind's eye because it cannot process what it's seeing. But that would
>> be kinda strange.
>
>I'm hoping there's a single "Looks inhuman" clan, with the ability to
>fill in for the Nosferatu, the Gangrel (well, their weakness), the more
>inhuman Tzimisce, and any other nonhuman-lookin' vampires one can think
>of. A single clan that can look like Count Orlock or Sasha Vycos
>depending on the individual, in other words.
I'd rather that all Vampires had the potential to look inhuman in one
way or another.
A 'looks beastly' clan, that amalgamates the Gangrel and Nos sounds
like a good plan.
>Maybe the clan as a whole looks like the Nos, but the bloodline
>offshoots look different. Assuming bloodlines still spring from or
>exist within clans, that is.
This is what I'm hoping for the 'bloodlines'. Ideally, any
sufficiently ancient vampire can sire one, and their descendents would
be recognisably tainted as hers. All manner of good or not so good
things arise from the idea.
Cheers,
Charlie