^ Well, I could be wrong about the performance, but a swear I saw multiple benchmark results showing the the 4300 beats out the Phenom II 965 by some margin. Also, the 4300 is somewhat better for overclocking. AND you can future proof your rig more by getting it. The Phenom is too old. That's like going to the store and buying a Radeon 5850 for your brand new build. Useless.
And
here is your
crap about a Xeon beating out an i5
Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.0GHz
Intel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Now (of course) the Xeon probably won't beat out a 3570K on gaming, but anything else, the 3570K won't come close to performing at the level of the Xeon.
But back to the benchmarks, you say that the 4300 is a terrible CPU for the price, but it is on par with the i3 3220. These are about the same in performance, but the 4300 has more cache and 2 more cores (which helps it stay on par with the i3) Of course, the FX-4300 is an overclocking machine. Now for $10 your can get the 6300, which has 2 more cores, and as
your benchmarks show, there is somewhat of an improvement over the 4300. So, as we all know the i3 3220 is better for gaming than the 965BE. So if a i3 is better than a 965BE, and the 4300 is on par with the i3, and the 6300 is even better than the 3220, how the hell is Piledriver a bad buy?