Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:cm24015lvs82qkhger1js560p9be7trb7u@4ax.com...
> If you get dust specs on your images using
> your DSLR, one magazine suggest making sure
> your camera bag is clean inside. Vaccumm it out.
> -Rich
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"C J Campbell" <christophercampbellNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HcidndCJyaNeyZ_fRVn-gg@wavecable.com...
>
> "RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
> news:cm24015lvs82qkhger1js560p9be7trb7u@4ax.com...
>> If you get dust specs on your images using
>> your DSLR, one magazine suggest making sure
>> your camera bag is clean inside. Vaccumm it out.
>> -Rich
>
> I am becoming a fan of the Copper Hill method.
>
>
I agree. The copper Hill website gives very good information and promotes
what I think is a superior device for swabbing the sensor.
Just a couple of weeks ago I also got a sensor brush from Visibledust. I
have tried it only once, but really liked it. I plan on using the solvent
free method of cleaning with the Sensor Brush (Visibledust), resorting to
wet-cleaning with the SensorSwipe from Copper Hill if/when required.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"Dennis Bradley" <dennis@no_spam_please_dbradley.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
message news:cttnpc$6s5$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> I agree with the original post, that prevention is better than cure so
> keeping the camera bag, lenses and other items dust free is to be
> recommended.
You mean, don't do like I did, where I saw just on little speck of dust on
the sensor, figured it would not hurt to just dab it out once with a lens
cloth.....
It took me weeks to remove all the lint from the camera. I still don't think
I have it all out.
And for my next trick, I think I will just drop an anvil on my bare toe. It
would be less stupid.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"C J Campbell" <christophercampbellNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cf2dnbp9Yv7W5p_fRVn-hA@wavecable.com...
>
> "Dennis Bradley" <dennis@no_spam_please_dbradley.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:cttnpc$6s5$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>
>> I agree with the original post, that prevention is better than cure so
>> keeping the camera bag, lenses and other items dust free is to be
>> recommended.
>
> You mean, don't do like I did, where I saw just on little speck of dust on
> the sensor, figured it would not hurt to just dab it out once with a lens
> cloth.....
>
> It took me weeks to remove all the lint from the camera. I still don't
> think
> I have it all out.
>
> And for my next trick, I think I will just drop an anvil on my bare toe.
> It
> would be less stupid.
>
>
When I do things like that I feel like kicking myself. Don't think I will
follow your example though. :-))
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
In message <cm24015lvs82qkhger1js560p9be7trb7u@4ax.com>,
RichA <none@none.com> wrote:
>If you get dust specs on your images using
>your DSLR, one magazine suggest making sure
>your camera bag is clean inside. Vaccumm it out.
Vacuuming reduces the amount of dust in an environment, but the very act
moves it around, replacing removed dust with new dust (you're drawing
air from the room into the area of low pressure). A better system would
be a vacuum combined with a blower, with the blower blowing filtered air
into the vicinity, so that it replaced the air that the vacuum is
removing, instead of particulate air from the environment.
--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:00:42 GMT, JPS@no.komm wrote:
>In message <cm24015lvs82qkhger1js560p9be7trb7u@4ax.com>,
>RichA <none@none.com> wrote:
>
>>If you get dust specs on your images using
>>your DSLR, one magazine suggest making sure
>>your camera bag is clean inside. Vaccumm it out.
>
>Vacuuming reduces the amount of dust in an environment, but the very act
>moves it around, replacing removed dust with new dust (you're drawing
>air from the room into the area of low pressure). A better system would
>be a vacuum combined with a blower, with the blower blowing filtered air
>into the vicinity, so that it replaced the air that the vacuum is
>removing, instead of particulate air from the environment.
Or vacuum outside. Depending on the environment (e.g. here in
Southern Ontario surrounded by snow-covered ground and somewhat damp
air, you can hardly get a more dust-free environment. Ken
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.