Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 7 > Win 7 64-bit build 7000 is out
Word :    Username :           
 

Well the 32-bit build 7000 has been out for some time, but the 64-bit one has now appeared. You know where to find it ;)

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

oh reallie random? where would that be? :D

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/590311.png
Reply to aznguy0028

I would link it, but my guess is that it's against ToS to do so. So for those that don't know where to look, use google. I'm getting a good 200kB/s download speed, which for me and this particular protocol, is very good.


Message edited by randomizer on 01-08-2009 at 02:20:18 AM
Reply to randomizer

If it's a torrent site, go ahead and name it.

------------------------------
The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. - HST

Reply to Jake_Barnes

I'm getting it from The Pirate Bay, but I'm sure it is at others. 214 seeds 1211 leechers (as expected).

Reply to randomizer

let us know how it runs. im kinda curious about w7 x64 myself.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/590311.png
Reply to aznguy0028

I was not overly impressed by build 6801. It wasn't any more responsive than Vista, and it had a couple of bugs that were quite noticeable. It didn't like me changing network settings, because when I clicked "OK" it would lock up until I ended the process. Fortunately the changes still stuck. Also, the "close" button in device manager properties for any device would flash like crazy when you moved the cursor over it :lol:

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

thanks!
downloading

Reply to alvine

There aren't many bugs in the beta, performance beats xp in every area but two, graphics and hdd performance. I expect before launch it'll be beating xp in hdd perf. but graphics may be the lone lagger still, will have to wait and see. Personally if I have to give up 2-4 FPS for all the other speed boosts and features I'll just buy a better graphics card, big whoop.


Message edited by LAN_deRf_HA on 01-08-2009 at 02:45:00 AM
------------------------------ Xeon X3350 @ 3.4 GHz >Asus X38 P5E >4 gigs DDR2 @850mhz 4 4 4 12 >X-fi Fatality
>Thermaltake Toughpower 650w >PALiT 260 GTX (216) @729/1458/2520


Reply to LAN_deRf_HA

I found XP slower than Vista in games. Negligibly, but still slower. For general responsiveness XP is still king between the two.

Reply to randomizer

randomizer wrote :

I found XP slower than Vista in games. Negligibly, but still slower. For general responsiveness XP is still king between the two.


i did too. i noticed my games in vista respond better. overall the responsiveness, in my experience, vista is so much quicker than xp. i have the same hardware configuration when i was using xp sp3, and vista sp1 blows it away. guess it depends person to person eh.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/590311.png
Reply to aznguy0028

Vista needs alot of services to be disabled before it boots close to XP SP3 times, but then it's not alot different. I still find XP is fully responsive after boot much quicker than Vista. Minutes quicker before services are disabled.

Reply to randomizer

Downloaded and attempted to install 64-bit Beta 1 today-- got 3/4 of the way through setup, it told me that Windows could not be installed on this hardware, exited. No details given on what was incompatible. Had to restore XP from a Ghost backup. CPU is Athlon X2 5050e, motherboard is Biostar MCP6P M2+, video card is Galaxy KFA2 Geforce Nvida 7300LE 256MB.

Edited to add:

By 3/4 through setup, I mean that the installation started, it worked through to the bottom item on the list of installation tasks, and the installation progress bar on the bottom of the screen had reached around 3/4 of the way across the bottom of the screen-- maybe half an hour into the installation. After that point was where it said that it could not be set up on that hardware. Reboot, it shows a screen that "Windows is starting services" or something like that (may be a standard Vista message, I've never touched Vista before) and then gave a message that setup wasn't complete, and I needed to re-run setup. Rather than attempt the install again (and surely see the same error message) I Ghosted XP back on.


Message edited by darren_garrison on 01-10-2009 at 02:58:14 AM
Reply to darren_garrison

Piratebay, lol. Oldschool. News groups are faster by 1000%+

Reply to roadrunner197069

Piratebay is always free, not just for 30 days :kaola:

Reply to randomizer

I pay $15 a month, but its well worth it :)

Reply to roadrunner197069

Which is best, upgrade from Vista Ultimate 64bit to Windows 7 64 bit or do a clean install of Windows 7?

------------------------------ http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/450637.png
Reply to dallasjoh

Always do clean installations :)

Reply to randomizer

I have the Windows 7 ISO but can't get the Key. Keep getting an error when I try to download the key telling me to try back tomorrow, so I don't know if I should go ahead and instal now and try to get the key later or wait for the key. I have a ghost image of my vista from yesterday. any suggestions?

------------------------------ http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/450637.png
Reply to dallasjoh

The keys aren't available yet, their servers crapped out from too much load (supposedly).

Reply to randomizer

I'm installing NOW!!! GO!!!

Reply to yetyhunter
- 0 +

http://blog.wired.com/business/200 [...] publi.html

download only took 50 minutes. intalling now. where do you get keys?

------------------------------ gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4|Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.4G | Sapphire Vapor-x 4870 1G CCC 9.6|4G PNY DDR2 800MHz 5-5-5-12|500G Seagate SATA II HD|Sunbeam core contact cooler 120mm|BFG Tech 800w| Win XP sp2| Antec 1200
Reply to 50bmg

50bmg wrote :

http://blog.wired.com/business/200 [...] publi.html

download only took 50 minutes. intalling now. where do you get keys?


I read that they now delayed the official release to Monday. :heink: In any case, the keys aren't available yet.

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

I read on a windows 7 tech blog (sorry forgot which one). They said Keys arent needed for a while. It installed fine for me. I hope it runs until the keys come out.

i installed 64bit, my first 64 bit, and i like it so far. IT looks just like vista, but it doesnt seem bogged down. It seems very quick.

------------------------------ gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4|Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.4G | Sapphire Vapor-x 4870 1G CCC 9.6|4G PNY DDR2 800MHz 5-5-5-12|500G Seagate SATA II HD|Sunbeam core contact cooler 120mm|BFG Tech 800w| Win XP sp2| Antec 1200
Reply to 50bmg

It looks like Vista? Are you sure you have build 7000? It doesn't really look that much like Vista to me. Check out the new customisable system tray and the control panel (I couldn't find mouse properties in there even :P). It's similar but not that close.

You get 30 days with no key.

Reply to randomizer

I have already ran into a problem trying to load the ATI Windows 7 Beta drivers for my HD3870 video card. After install it keeps saying "no drivers installed for the video card." Just thought you guys would like to know.

------------------------------ http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/450637.png
Reply to dallasjoh

Run in Vista compatibility mode and as administrator if you have UAC running.

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

I have 2-3870s in xfire, i installed ccc 8.12 64bit with no problems on my win 7 beta. uninstall the drivers and try again.

I picked up 10-15 fps on COD5. I still needed a DX9 .dll. That brings up a question. DXIAG says it is running DX11. What gives.?

------------------------------ gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4|Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.4G | Sapphire Vapor-x 4870 1G CCC 9.6|4G PNY DDR2 800MHz 5-5-5-12|500G Seagate SATA II HD|Sunbeam core contact cooler 120mm|BFG Tech 800w| Win XP sp2| Antec 1200
Reply to 50bmg
- 0 +

randomizer wrote :

It looks like Vista? Are you sure you have build 7000? It doesn't really look that much like Vista to me. Check out the new customisable system tray and the control panel (I couldn't find mouse properties in there even :P). It's similar but not that close.



I agree. It is similar. I never used vista for any real time. My wife has it. Ive had xp 32 for years. The desktop is similar to vista. I have had no problem finding my way around control panel, device manager...all that hasnt changed much.

so far, i still like it. The 64 bit is a nice improvement for me personally. Now i can use all 4G of RAM and 1G of video RAM.

edit: mouse? find it in control panel > ease of access.


Message edited by 50bmg on 01-10-2009 at 07:53:01 AM
------------------------------ gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4|Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.4G | Sapphire Vapor-x 4870 1G CCC 9.6|4G PNY DDR2 800MHz 5-5-5-12|500G Seagate SATA II HD|Sunbeam core contact cooler 120mm|BFG Tech 800w| Win XP sp2| Antec 1200
Reply to 50bmg

Well, the classic control panel is fine, but the default one seems to have rearranged things and hidden them in new places. Why is it in easy of access when it's clearly a device or hardware?

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

There are crap load of items in" control panel > all control panel items". There is another mouse item in there.

My system had a Windows Experience score of 7.9 on average, except the HD i used for this beta is a 5 year old sata. It scored a 2.9. lol. 7.9 is the highest. CPU 6.9, memory 5.9, graphics 7.9, 3d graphics 6.0.

i can understand my cpu being 6.9. It is a dual core, even tho it is at 3.8G. I guess my patriot 2.0v RAM DDR2 score lower because there is DDR3 out now. My 2 CF 3870s are a bit dated. Otherswise not a bad score. I need a better hard drive for my final build.

edit: 3dmark06 scored 16400. On win xp 32 it usually scores 17000.
I havent tried vantage yet.


Message edited by 50bmg on 01-10-2009 at 04:07:44 PM
------------------------------ gigabyte GA-EX38-DS4|Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.4G | Sapphire Vapor-x 4870 1G CCC 9.6|4G PNY DDR2 800MHz 5-5-5-12|500G Seagate SATA II HD|Sunbeam core contact cooler 120mm|BFG Tech 800w| Win XP sp2| Antec 1200
Reply to 50bmg
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 7 > Win 7 64-bit build 7000 is out
Go to:

There are 576 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them