Don't use your cd-writer as a cd-rom drive myth

G

Guest

Guest
I have a HP 4*2*24, and I wanted to use it as my cd-rom drive also, so I don't have to buy a new cd-rom drive. But my friend tells me that I shouldn't do this, because the reader in a writer is much heavier than the one in a standard cd-rom drive, so a writer will get worn out much faster than a normal drive.

Is this argument viable?
 

Arrow

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
4,123
0
22,780
Every CDROM/RW drive has a limited number of "power on hours," that is, the amount of time it can spend reading/writing to a CD before failure, on average. The MTBF, or mean time between failures, specifies this number of Power On Hours.
So if you use your CDRW to just read CDs, you are in essence taking away from its life.

Rob
Please visit <b><A HREF="http://www.ncix.com/canada/index.cfm?affiliateid=319048" target="_new">http://www.ncix.com/canada/index.cfm?affiliateid=319048</A></b>
 

AMD_Man

Splendid
Jul 3, 2001
7,376
2
25,780
True Arrow but all drives and computer components have MTBFs so that doesn't just apply for CD-RWs.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
 

DaveGOD

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2001
274
0
18,780
uh but a cdrw more expensive to replace than a CDROM... my GUESS is its a case of if you have an extra CDROM, use that, if not, might as well just use the CDRW....

"Bring out the dead..."
"I'm not dead yet!"
"Yes you are!"
 

forgettythatty

Distinguished
Jun 22, 2001
309
0
18,780
its called bypassing the securom protection. but you can use the newest clone to do this at www.elby.org (if you live in the US or great britain change the amplifyweak thing in the registry from 0 to 1.), or you can mount an image with www.daemon-tools.com or just try the emulation

"the reader in a writer is much heavier than the one in a standard cd-rom drive, so a writer will get worn out much faster than a normal drive." Just ignore that. that is not why the rumor got started.
 

Arrow

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
4,123
0
22,780
I agree. For most users, that's the case.

Rob
Please visit <b><A HREF="http://www.ncix.com/canada/index.cfm?affiliateid=319048" target="_new">http://www.ncix.com/canada/index.cfm?affiliateid=319048</A></b>
 

Arrow

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
4,123
0
22,780
For "everyday" tasks, I don't think you'd notice the difference between a 32x and 50x. Besides, they usually don't read at max speed.

Rob
Please visit <b><A HREF="http://www.ncix.com/canada/index.cfm?affiliateid=319048" target="_new">http://www.ncix.com/canada/index.cfm?affiliateid=319048</A></b>