Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
on the subject of comparing digital to medium format. i am a hobbyist that
shoots 90% landscapes, with most of my prints done 20 x 24 and an occasional
30 x 40. i am a sharpness freak, btw. i dont have the money to spend on a
canon 1D plus lenses. last year i sold all of my 6 x 9 and 4 x 5 equipment,
so it will be all different equipment for me anyway. please give me your
suggestions for a camera that would serve me well for less than $2000, and
used is definitely ok. i am headed to hawaii and would love to use it there.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
grilla wrote:
> on the subject of comparing digital to medium format. i am a hobbyist that
> shoots 90% landscapes, with most of my prints done 20 x 24 and an
> occasional 30 x 40. i am a sharpness freak, btw. i dont have the money to
> spend on a
> canon 1D plus lenses. last year i sold all of my 6 x 9 and 4 x 5
> equipment, so it will be all different equipment for me anyway. please
> give me your suggestions for a camera that would serve me well for less
> than $2000, and used is definitely ok. i am headed to hawaii and would
> love to use it there.
So let me get this right, you're used to 30X40 prints from 4X5 and want a
digital to replace that for under $2000? Sounds more like you need a fuji
6X9 rangefinder to me..
--
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"grilla" <grilla@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:6wWSd.19028$D34.16657@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> on the subject of comparing digital to medium format. i am a hobbyist that
> shoots 90% landscapes, with most of my prints done 20 x 24 and an
> occasional 30 x 40. i am a sharpness freak, btw. i dont have the money to
> spend on a canon 1D plus lenses. last year i sold all of my 6 x 9 and 4 x
> 5 equipment, so it will be all different equipment for me anyway. please
> give me your suggestions for a camera that would serve me well for less
> than $2000, and used is definitely ok. i am headed to hawaii and would
> love to use it there.
>
Remember, in your post you said "best you can buy digital print." $2000
doesn't get you the best you can buy, more on the order of $10,000 and up
will. The Canon 1Ds mkII mentioned in the article is about $8000, the
Mamiya ZD I mentioned runs about $10,000, body only, and the 32mp Hassy back
even more than that. $2000 will get you a 20D with a 28-135 IS or 17-85 IS
lens, which will get you very nice 16x20s, but if you push it to 30x40, you
may be disappointed. You may be able to find a used Canon 1Ds (11mp, not
mkII) for that price, but it's unlikely, I'm looking at one for $5000, and
used digital backs for MF are still up in that range and more.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Stacey wrote
>So let me get this right, you're used to 30X40 prints from 4X5 and want a
>digital to replace that for under $2000? Sounds more like you need a fuji
>6X9 rangefinder to me..
Or something like a 1D/10D/20D, stitching software, a fast PC and a lot
of organisation and patience.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
<birch999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:421cba01.14678875@news.netrover.com...
> >On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 "Skip M" <shadowcatcher@cox.net> wrote:
>>Mamiya ZD I mentioned runs about $10,000, body only, and the 32mp Hassy
>>back
>
> Hey . . Rollei just brought out their first digital TLR: 2 mp for
> $349.00 !!?? :-)
Well, it should have nice glass and a nice body and case, anyway... ;-)
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.