Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Hi Group,
I'm enjoying my new D70... so much faster in terms of operation than my
old Oly E10. I should have checked if it did black & white but anyway.. it
doesn't. So I've read up about the different ways of converting to B&W in
photoshop ; there's quite a choice. However when it came to printing, my old
Epson photo700 (* has a pin which is not firing giving streaks... so I need
to buy a new printer ) does a poor job in B&W... but then I read all inkjet
do a poor job of B&W... so my question is "what's a good up-to-date printer
for black and white ?"
As for dust issues, I decided to keep the 18-70mm on all the time. What
disappoints me slightly is that all these new DSLRs have such slow (aperture
wise) lenses.. F3.5 - 4.5 !
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"Roland Herrera" <wps@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote >
>However when it came to printing, my old Epson photo700 (* has a pin which
>is not firing giving streaks... so I need to buy a new printer ) does a
>poor job in B&W... but then I read all inkjet do a poor job of B&W... so my
>question is "what's a good up-to-date printer for black and white ?"
The better HP Photosmarts do an exceptionally good job with black and white
when you use the special #59 HP Photo Gray Cartridge. I have a HP
Photosmart 7760 and I am very pleased with its black & white as well as its
color printing.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
my epson 2200 does a very fine job in printing b/w even with the
epson-supplied profiles (use color settings, not black only)...
"Roland Herrera" <wps@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
newsf0_d.72900$y25.55149@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Hi Group,
>
> I'm enjoying my new D70... so much faster in terms of operation than my
> old Oly E10. I should have checked if it did black & white but anyway.. it
> doesn't. So I've read up about the different ways of converting to B&W in
> photoshop ; there's quite a choice. However when it came to printing, my
> old Epson photo700 (* has a pin which is not firing giving streaks... so I
> need to buy a new printer ) does a poor job in B&W... but then I read all
> inkjet do a poor job of B&W... so my question is "what's a good up-to-date
> printer for black and white ?"
>
> As for dust issues, I decided to keep the 18-70mm on all the time. What
> disappoints me slightly is that all these new DSLRs have such slow
> (aperture wise) lenses.. F3.5 - 4.5 !
>
> ciao,
> Roland Herrera
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:00:35 GMT, "Roland Herrera"
<wps@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>Hi Group,
>
> I'm enjoying my new D70... so much faster in terms of operation than my
>old Oly E10. I should have checked if it did black & white but anyway.. it
>doesn't. So I've read up about the different ways of converting to B&W in
>photoshop ; there's quite a choice. However when it came to printing, my old
>Epson photo700 (* has a pin which is not firing giving streaks... so I need
>to buy a new printer ) does a poor job in B&W... but then I read all inkjet
>do a poor job of B&W... so my question is "what's a good up-to-date printer
>for black and white ?"
>
> As for dust issues, I decided to keep the 18-70mm on all the time. What
>disappoints me slightly is that all these new DSLRs have such slow (aperture
>wise) lenses.. F3.5 - 4.5 !
>
>ciao,
>Roland Herrera
HP Photosmart 7960 with the grey carts.
It's B&W output is awesome!
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
In article <Df0_d.72900$y25.55149@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Roland Herrera <wps@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>Hi Group,
>
> I'm enjoying my new D70... so much faster in terms of operation than my
[ ... ]
> As for dust issues, I decided to keep the 18-70mm on all the time. What
>disappoints me slightly is that all these new DSLRs have such slow (aperture
>wise) lenses.. F3.5 - 4.5 !
The "kit" lens does, and my 28-105mm f3.5-4.5D does, but that is
not all -- if you don't lock yourself out by refusing to change lenses.
I'm using in addition to the 28-105mm, a 180mm f2.8 (CPU
converted and no autofocus), and a 50mm f1.4 AF Nikor with factory CPU.
While the ability to set auto ISO to step up to ISO 1600 if necessary
does make living with the smaller apertures easier (unless you *want* to
have minimum depth of field), having the faster lenses available is a
nice plus.
Enjoy,
DoN.
--
Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.