Archived from groups: alt.games.whitewolf (
More info?)
handofomega@hotmail.com wrote:
> Richard Clayton wrote:
>
>> I was particularly upset when one of my co-workers suggested that it
>>might nearly be treason for Kerry to run against a "war president"
> like
>>Bush. The rationale was that Bush might have very good reasons for
> the
>>apparent mistakes he's made in handling the Iraq debacle, but since
> it's
>>a war he might not be able to explain them for reasons of national
>>security. Thus, challenging him on those issues is tantamount to
>>deliberate sabotage of our war effort.
>
> Sounds like my co-worker who (in defence of Bush's poor military
> record) "explained" how George, Jr. couldn't be allowed to actually
> serve in action because if he was captured, the enemy would have some
> real leverage on the US.
>
> Although he couldn't really say anything when I pointed out to him that
> that's simply a rationalization for having a ruling class that never
> has to risk themselves or their children in fighting the wars that they
> start and largely benefit from...
You know, there was a time when it was considered a mark of honor for
the sons of a family to serve in the military-- even families of wealth
and privilege, and ESPECIALLY families with political connections.
Then again, if I'd been born eight years later, I'm not sure I'd want
to enlist *today* either. It's not the same military today as it was
when I joined.
--
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Richard Clayton
"The world needs more Starscream." -- Stephenls