Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Asus GTX DirectCU II Top, 660 Ti, 670, 680

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
September 28, 2012 9:15:13 PM

Im thinking of buying one of these. However, Im wondering if 660 Ti is even worth it, or is 670 far so much superrior in performance. I know that 670 costs about only 100€ less than 680.

You may wonder what makes me decide to buy DirectCU II? Its extremely silent in use.

Reviews that also convienced me to get one is here:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660...

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_670...
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_680...

Note: There is nothing other wrong with Radeon cards, except that GeForces have tendency to be better in games currently.

More about : asus gtx directcu top 660 670 680

September 28, 2012 9:56:56 PM

670 for the money.
a c 143 U Graphics card
September 28, 2012 10:13:25 PM

BlizzardGamer said:
There is nothing other wrong with Radeon cards, except that GeForces have tendency to be better in games currently.

And how do you see this?
Related resources
a c 186 U Graphics card
September 28, 2012 10:35:18 PM

The 670 Asus Top i would pick out those but to each his or her own.
September 30, 2012 8:47:39 PM

ilysaml said:
And how do you see this?

They just tend to work better in Blizzard games and BF3
Anonymous
October 1, 2012 9:52:22 AM

i have an asus gtx 670 directcu2 non top edition, its incredibly silent and doesnt run very hot, i use msi afterburner for OCing which isnt even needed because its already ridiculously good. the 660ti isnt the bestvalue because of amd competition in that price range, i would get the 670, its as powerful as a reference 680 with an OC and saves you some money.
July 21, 2014 6:12:28 PM

I have the Asus GTX DirectCU II 660 Ti OC, and it works great. And if you're up for it, I would honestly set them up in an SLI. I'm getting around 160 fps in skyrim on ultra high 1920x1080. It beats out even the geforce gtx 780.
!