Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
I'm look for a battery charger which can charge two BP511's at time.
The only one I find is Canon which doesn't have a car power outlet
adapter and is ridiculously expense.
Anyone know of any alternative?
******************************************************
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
From: "John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net>
| I'm look for a battery charger which can charge two BP511's at time.
| The only one I find is Canon which doesn't have a car power outlet
| adapter and is ridiculously expense.
|
| Anyone know of any alternative?
| ******************************************************
|
| "History is a vast early warning system"
|
| Norman Cousins
Use an Inverter. I use a 375watt TrippLite unit. $41.00 US You can use the inverter for
other AC appliances as well which makes getting an inverter more versatile than just a 12vdc
battery changer for the Canon battery.
http://www.buy.com/retail/product. [...] c=101&sp=1
You can have two Power 2000 single units connected to the above (2 AC sockets) and two
single battery charger units cost less than one dual battery charger unit.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
In article <b3cr41hdj7nmi722rjj34chcfug4655crv@4ax.com>,
John A. Stovall <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote:
>I'm look for a battery charger which can charge two BP511's at time.
>The only one I find is Canon which doesn't have a car power outlet
>adapter and is ridiculously expense.
>
>Anyone know of any alternative?
My one (from Canon, and indeed ridiculously expensive) does have a
car adapter, and can accept two BP511s. It doesn't actually charge
them both at the same time - it charges them is sequence.
>In article <b3cr41hdj7nmi722rjj34chcfug4655crv@4ax.com>,
>John A. Stovall <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>I'm look for a battery charger which can charge two BP511's at time.
>>The only one I find is Canon which doesn't have a car power outlet
>>adapter and is ridiculously expense.
>>
>>Anyone know of any alternative?
>
>My one (from Canon, and indeed ridiculously expensive) does have a
>car adapter, and can accept two BP511s. It doesn't actually charge
>them both at the same time - it charges them is sequence.
>
>The model number is CG-560
I was looking at the CA-PS400 and they claim it charges two at once .
In another forum it was pointed out two of the cheaper charger and an
inverter (which I have would be cheaper). I may go with that for car
charging.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:qior41p60d9li0la0q6uglj6078b501qdm@4ax.com...
> I was looking at the CA-PS400 and they claim it charges two at once .
True, and then you need a DC cord, in addition to the $100 charger.
> In another forum it was pointed out two of the cheaper charger and an
> inverter (which I have would be cheaper). I may go with that for car
> charging.
Just get two of the Lenmar DVC-511 ($39), and it comes with AC and DC cords.
You could even do a custom wiring harness to run both off of a single DC
plug (not sure if the AC adapter puts out enough current for two chargers,
but you could build a DC harness that would work, and you could always buy a
higher current AC adapter for two chargers).
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
In article <CCz3e.2287$44.1314@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Steven M. Scharf <scharf.steven@linkearth.net> wrote:
>"John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:qior41p60d9li0la0q6uglj6078b501qdm@4ax.com...
>> I was looking at the CA-PS400 and they claim it charges two at once .
>
>True, and then you need a DC cord, in addition to the $100 charger.
Is $100 supposed to be expensive? The charger I mentioned, which
I purchased when I was taking my PowerShot G1 on a long trip abroad,
ended up costing me $160 - nobody except Canon had them at the time.
Then top that off with another $60 for a second BP-511. (I could have
got that a little cheaper from another source, but not by very much).
Still, at least mine included the car adapter cord at no extra charge.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:s7vv41dgikhfoig21p6h2nm8046pe96u53@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:37:21 GMT, John A. Stovall
> <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> My solution: It's not much if any cheaper than the Canon but more
> flexible.
>
> 1 - SPP-04 - Lenmar - Power Port 4 Outlet DC Power Socket
>
> 2 - LENMAR DVC-511 OmniSource® AC/DC Power/Charger System for Canon
> (LENMAR DVC511)
You could build a wiring harness that ran both chargers off of a single 12V
DC plug.
Just buy one of these
http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi- [...] &item=CLP- Y&type=store and cut off the socket ends, cut the cigarette lighter plugs
off of the cords that come with the DVC-511s and and splice the cords to the
Y. It'll be less bulky. I hate all those big old cigarette lighter
splitters.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
From: "John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net>
| On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:37:21 GMT, John A. Stovall
| <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote:
|
| My solution: It's not much if any cheaper than the Canon but more
| flexible.
|
| 1 - SPP-04 - Lenmar - Power Port 4 Outlet DC Power Socket
|
| 2 - LENMAR DVC-511 OmniSource® AC/DC Power/Charger System for Canon
| (LENMAR DVC511)
|
| Thanks for all the help and suggestions.
|
| ******************************************************************
|
| "The past is foreign country: they do things differently there."
|
| _The Go-Between_
| L.P. Hartley
| 1895 - 1972
The cigarette lighter splitter could be found at your local Radio Shack. I saw a similar
product there when I bought a cigrette lighter socket with battery post clamps at a local
store.
Both are AC and 12vdc. What do you expect to gain by paying 2 1/3 more with Lenmar ?
I point this out becuase in your original post you declared what you looked for "...is
ridiculously expense."
I looked at Lenmar products and they are way overpriced.
> I looked at Lenmar products and they are way overpriced.
You are comparing the MSRP of the Lenmar products, with the street prices of
the other products. If you compare street prices, then there is little or no
difference. Probably if you compare the MSRPs there would also be little or
no difference.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:s7vv41dgikhfoig21p6h2nm8046pe96u53@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:37:21 GMT, John A. Stovall
> <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> My solution: It's not much if any cheaper than the Canon but more
> flexible.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
From: "Steven M. Scharf" <scharf.steven@linkearth.net>
| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
| news:YgU3e.11610$Fh2.9032@trnddc04...
|
>> The Lenmar DVC-511 is $70.00
>>
| http://lenmar.com/details.asp?mode [...] argers&man | ufacturer=Canon
|
| It is not $70, it is $39. See http://tinylink.com/?PIeMeuHZQZ |
| The Power 2000 chargers have problems in fully charging batteries, making
| the slight extra cost of the Lenmar units well worth it.
|
| For batteries, the best deals are at Sterlingtek.com, see
| http://sterlingtek.com/ln03-canon-bp-511-dlc511.html, but the Lenmar DLC-511
| is $30, see
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ [...] 53-7912767 | with free shipping.
|
>> I looked at Lenmar products and they are way overpriced.
|
| You are comparing the MSRP of the Lenmar products, with the street prices of
| the other products. If you compare street prices, then there is little or no
| difference. Probably if you compare the MSRPs there would also be little or
| no difference.
|
You have a good point of MSRP vs retail prices. I went directly to Lenmar's web site based
upon a previous post pointing to the Lenmar site and I must admit I did not search for
retail prices vs the manufacturer prices.
However, a smart shopper would not get from Amazon, they would go to trusted sources. For
example; B&H
I have no experience with SterlingTek. However, the price of their no-name brand battery @
1.8Ahr /*is*/ the best.
I have bookmarked SterlingTek and I will check their references for possible purchases at a
future date. Thanx !
BTW: None of the information I have heard has been negative in anyway on Power2000
products.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Steven M. Scharf" <scharf.steven@linkearth.net>
>
>> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
>> news:YgU3e.11610$Fh2.9032@trnddc04...
>>
>>> The Lenmar DVC-511 is $70.00
>>>
>> http://lenmar.com/details.asp?mode [...] argers&man >> ufacturer=Canon
>>
>> It is not $70, it is $39. See http://tinylink.com/?PIeMeuHZQZ >>
>> The Power 2000 chargers have problems in fully charging batteries,
>> making
>> the slight extra cost of the Lenmar units well worth it.
>>
>> For batteries, the best deals are at Sterlingtek.com, see
>> http://sterlingtek.com/ln03-canon-bp-511-dlc511.html, but the Lenmar
>> DLC-511
>> is $30, see
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ [...] 53-7912767 >> with free shipping.
>>
>>> I looked at Lenmar products and they are way overpriced.
>>
>> You are comparing the MSRP of the Lenmar products, with the street
>> prices of
>> the other products. If you compare street prices, then there is
>> little or no
>> difference. Probably if you compare the MSRPs there would also be
>> little or
>> no difference.
>>
>
>
> You have a good point of MSRP vs retail prices. I went directly to
> Lenmar's web site based upon a previous post pointing to the Lenmar
> site and I must admit I did not search for retail prices vs the
> manufacturer prices.
>
> However, a smart shopper would not get from Amazon, they would go to
> trusted sources. For example; B&H
>
> I have no experience with SterlingTek. However, the price of their
> no-name brand battery @
> 1.8Ahr /*is*/ the best.
>
> I have bookmarked SterlingTek and I will check their references for
> possible purchases at a future date. Thanx !
>
> BTW: None of the information I have heard has been negative in
> anyway on Power2000 products.
I have two of the SterlingTek 511s. they were still going at 1500 shots,
plenty of flash and viewing, when I broke down and recharged them for a
lengthy project away from the power grid. _Via_ Amazon.com they came to
about $16.00 each, including (upper limit of acceptability, my view)
S&H. Quick delivery, friendly communication.
Assuming their batteries for other uses are of equal performance, I'd
recommend them. Recently I aquired a SterlingTek for Minolta Dimmidge Xt
and one for Canon S500. Haven't used them enough to say anything, yet.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:12:11 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>From: "Steven M. Scharf" <scharf.steven@linkearth.net>
>
>| "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
>| news:YgU3e.11610$Fh2.9032@trnddc04...
>|
>>> The Lenmar DVC-511 is $70.00
>>>
>| http://lenmar.com/details.asp?mode [...] argers&man >| ufacturer=Canon
>|
>| It is not $70, it is $39. See http://tinylink.com/?PIeMeuHZQZ >|
>| The Power 2000 chargers have problems in fully charging batteries, making
>| the slight extra cost of the Lenmar units well worth it.
>|
>| For batteries, the best deals are at Sterlingtek.com, see
>| http://sterlingtek.com/ln03-canon-bp-511-dlc511.html, but the Lenmar DLC-511
>| is $30, see
>| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ [...] 53-7912767 >| with free shipping.
>|
>>> I looked at Lenmar products and they are way overpriced.
>|
>| You are comparing the MSRP of the Lenmar products, with the street prices of
>| the other products. If you compare street prices, then there is little or no
>| difference. Probably if you compare the MSRPs there would also be little or
>| no difference.
>|
>
>
>You have a good point of MSRP vs retail prices. I went directly to Lenmar's web site based
>upon a previous post pointing to the Lenmar site and I must admit I did not search for
>retail prices vs the manufacturer prices.
>
>However, a smart shopper would not get from Amazon, they would go to trusted sources. For
>example; B&H
>
Why would you not consider Amazon (since it direct not through a
re-seller) a trusted source? I've bought thousands of dollar from
them and never a problem. In fact I got my 20D body from them cheaper
and quicker than from B&H. I do get my lenses from B&H since Amazon
doesn't care the one I want.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
From: "John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net>
| Why would you not consider Amazon (since it direct not through a
| re-seller) a trusted source? I've bought thousands of dollar from
| them and never a problem. In fact I got my 20D body from them cheaper
| and quicker than from B&H. I do get my lenses from B&H since Amazon
| doesn't care the one I want.
|
| *****************************************************
|
| "Vietnam is what we had instead of happy childhoods."
|
| Tim Page in
| "Dispatches"
| by Michael Herr
ebay and Amazon just don't fit the requirements, at least for me. There have been cases for
both where accounts have been provided by bad employees to bad people. eBay is even worse.
There is much fraud associated with eBay deals. Both buyers and sellers. Amazon started as
an online book store. Let them stay that way. I'd rather get to know a supplier, check
their respective BBB records, send them a letter of "right to pricacy", etc. Today you have
to be careful who you dio business with and Amazon isn't on the chart. When it comes to
doing business on the Internet, paranoia means "a heightened sense of awareness".
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:31:36 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>From: "John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net>
>
>| Why would you not consider Amazon (since it direct not through a
>| re-seller) a trusted source? I've bought thousands of dollar from
>| them and never a problem. In fact I got my 20D body from them cheaper
>| and quicker than from B&H. I do get my lenses from B&H since Amazon
>| doesn't care the one I want.
>|
>| *****************************************************
>|
>| "Vietnam is what we had instead of happy childhoods."
>|
>| Tim Page in
>| "Dispatches"
>| by Michael Herr
>
>ebay and Amazon just don't fit the requirements, at least for me. There have been cases for
>both where accounts have been provided by bad employees to bad people. eBay is even worse.
>There is much fraud associated with eBay deals. Both buyers and sellers. Amazon started as
>an online book store. Let them stay that way. I'd rather get to know a supplier, check
>their respective BBB records, send them a letter of "right to pricacy", etc. Today you have
>to be careful who you dio business with and Amazon isn't on the chart. When it comes to
>doing business on the Internet, paranoia means "a heightened sense of awareness".
I agree on eBay but you seem to be comparing Amazon to it's affiliates
and resellers then there is world of difference but not if it's direct
from Amazon.
"Every man, woman, and responsible child has a natural,
fundamental, and inalienable human, individual, civil, and
Constitutional right (within the limits of the Non-Aggression
Principle) to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any
weapon -- handgun, shotgun, rifle, machinegun, anything
-- anytime, anywhere, without asking anyone's permission."
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "John A. Stovall" <johnastovall@earthlink.net>
>
>> Why would you not consider Amazon (since it direct not through a
>> re-seller) a trusted source? I've bought thousands of dollar from
>> them and never a problem. In fact I got my 20D body from them
>> cheaper
>> and quicker than from B&H. I do get my lenses from B&H since Amazon
>> doesn't care the one I want.
>>
>> *****************************************************
>>
>> "Vietnam is what we had instead of happy childhoods."
>>
>> Tim Page in
>> "Dispatches"
>> by Michael Herr
>
> ebay and Amazon just don't fit the requirements, at least for me.
> There have been cases for both where accounts have been provided by
> bad employees to bad people. eBay is even worse. There is much fraud
> associated with eBay deals. Both buyers and sellers. Amazon started
> as an online book store. Let them stay that way. I'd rather get to
> know a supplier, check their respective BBB records, send them a
> letter of "right to pricacy", etc. Today you have to be careful who
> you dio business with and Amazon isn't on the chart. When it comes
> to doing business on the Internet, paranoia means "a heightened sense
> of awareness".
It's usually pretty easy to go from Amazon's offers to their sources. If
the sources don't measure up, you're free to go elsewhere. In every
instance I have bought from Amazon or its referrals the value was
excellent, the delivery was safe and quick, and I had no problems
whatsoever. Often the goods are shipped from Adorama, or from J&S or
another reputable seller, at a price and shipping cost well below what
the latter offered on their Web sites.
As for a "heightened sense of awareness", I think that is a muddy phrase
that sounds good but is meaningless.
--
Frank ess
"My mud is as thick as anyone's". —Steve McQueen, motorcycle racer
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:Lze4e.2719$Q26.394@trnddc05...
> However, a smart shopper would not get from Amazon, they would go to
trusted sources. For
> example; B&H
Huh? Amazon is about as trusted as you can get. Plus they have a much better
return policy than other vendors.
Amazon prices end up being less than the stated price. You can use an Amazon
Visa card to get a 3% rebate (pretty significant on a D-SLR), and if you
have a web site you can become an Amazon Affiliate, getting 5-8% additional
discount in rebates. I became an affiliate due to my digital camera sites,
and have been happy to get a few hundred bucks in referral fees, as well as
saving on the stuff I buy myself.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.