Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (
More info?)
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:38:12 +0200, Roxy d'Urban <not@home.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:27:13 +0000, Ken Ellis wrote:
>
>> Aint it great Kyle...So there is so much stuff on the web..tutorials,
>> etc. But, like anything else you need to know what yout looking for.
>> My suggestion is to buy Scott Kelbys "The Photoshop Book for Digital
>> Photographers" (comes in CS or ver 7 flavors). Can't praise it enough
>> for it's readablitiy, parsimony, and usefulness. Beyond that, check on
>> amazon for used copies of Katrin Eismann's books: "Masking and
>> Compositing" and "Restoration and Retouching". Betwean these
>> you'll get a usable grasp of setting up photoshop, workflow and
>> organization, the basic tools and techniques, key combos, how to's,
>> etc..
>
>I have this book by Kelby and he does offer some good tips. However, I
>don't like his writing style - he's too off-the-wall for me. His book also
>assumes that you have a working knowledge of PS to begin with - might be a
>problem for rank beginners.
>
>There are loads of very good magazines out there as well. Many of them
>come with DVD's/CD's loaded with tutorials and trial software, plug-ins,
>etc.
Well, hmmm.... I thought his style interesting and easy reading;
conversational and not a dry and technical tome; but i can understand
your point. Also I had been dabbling in photoshop, and other proggys
for awhile - muddling thru. Perhaps I am overstating it's facile
nature. Your opinion certainly would substatiate that. I can only
say I honestly feel it's "readablity, parsimony, and usefulness"
are for a beginner (although not soley); and a fine choice. In my
mind, I was comparing it to say, Real World Photoshop by Blatner and
Fraser. This I found to be a bit more involved and relatively a harder
(and longer) read. Great book, mind you, but not as much a "down and
dirty". Perhaps it's more app and feature oriented, and less task.
It is a much more detailed work. Apples and oranges I suspect.
True, there are many periodicals which over time cover many of
the same topics to varying degrees of lucidity. I wouldn't suggest
that venue as a mainstay in the learning process however. They
are more like dessert..and perhaps redundant; sometime ill
prepared. A sort of pot-luck (i must be getting hungry).
REM: is that the kind of style thing you dislike?
I think an organised and fundamental approach which focuses
on important tasks is the best. Often, short of an actual course
in the subject, a well organized, thoughtful and well edited
book will serve excellently. Supplement that as you proceed thru it -
on topic - with forrays into the internet and the newsstand.
So for what it's worth, i've had my say; Kelby's and Eismann's books.
I appreciate the dialogue and glimpse through others eyes.
rgds
Ken