So I have some friends at university who all say that there is no point in getting an AMD card at all because Nvidia are better in every way.
Yes, I know, please keep reading.
They seem to think that Physx is a huge selling point (because of some incredibly specific demos they saw on Nvidia's youtube channel) and that CUDA is a big selling point to a consumer.
But one thing that particularly interested me is that one of them said "yeah, and you should see Radeon's utterly *** open gl performance compared to Nvidia". This piqued my interest and I did some research but there doesn't seem to be any definitive answers and I do not know of any benchmarks that could accurately delineate such a claim.
So I'm wondering if anyone with a bit of knowledge on the matter could help out. How does AMD's Open GL performance stack up against Nvidia's?
Yes, I know, please keep reading.
They seem to think that Physx is a huge selling point (because of some incredibly specific demos they saw on Nvidia's youtube channel) and that CUDA is a big selling point to a consumer.
But one thing that particularly interested me is that one of them said "yeah, and you should see Radeon's utterly *** open gl performance compared to Nvidia". This piqued my interest and I did some research but there doesn't seem to be any definitive answers and I do not know of any benchmarks that could accurately delineate such a claim.
So I'm wondering if anyone with a bit of knowledge on the matter could help out. How does AMD's Open GL performance stack up against Nvidia's?