Asus 7770 2GB VS Asus 650 TI

I find it interesting that the very day am new nvidia card comes it is the only recommendation. How many of you guys are paid by Nvidia? Get any free gear and kickbacks?

Yes the 2GB version does pull ahead in skyrim but all the rest it doesn't make much of a difference to notice when compared to other cards. Aim higher and get a 7850 then overclock it ;)
 

Ironslice

Honorable
May 1, 2012
648
0
11,060


Are you being payed by AMD, or just completely biased? The GTX 650 ti owns the 7770, whichever version it might be. The 7850 is another story though, if he wants to pay the extra.
 

XXStavrosXX

Honorable
Aug 24, 2012
238
0
10,710


So you really understood that i actually recommended 650ti? I think that I am pretty clear when I say that 7850 is a better choice. But it is also more expensive and it is a bit irrelevant with the question of the topic. OP asks if 650ti or 7770 2GB on the same money is a better deal, and I answer that 650ti is stronger than 7770 so he should opt for the first.
 

proffet

Honorable
Aug 30, 2012
489
0
10,810
650Ti is not worth the price, HD 7850 is a better GPU but I do like having PhysX, GTX 660 maybe.?
HD 7770 = MEH..

[flash=560,315]http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/UgnS4Uu15ms?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0[/flash]
 

Wazzup4567

Honorable
Oct 9, 2012
23
0
10,510
So in comparison then, the 6870 would be the better choice out of the two?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150521

What would be the closest comparison to the 6870 Nvidea (and Price) Wise?

Im looking for a card that is about Sub $180



My rig is currently...

Cooler Master eXtreme Power 500w PSU
Kingston Hyper X 8GB Ram
XFX 5450 (I need to upgrade this thing. Looking for the best Sub $180 Model)
Asus M5A78L-M LX PLUS Mobo
Seagate Barricuda 1TB 7200RPM HDD
AMD FX 4100 OC'd to 4.0GHz
Thermaltake Commander MS-i Snow Edition Case
 
I would grab the 7770 just based on prices. in most benchmarks the 650ti only performs about 5-7fps better while costing 20 bucks more. (cheapest 7770 vs cheapest 650ti, not including the rebates you get with the 7770)

Comes down to how flexible your budget is and how much you want to pay to get those extra frames. (still in the process of reading the article btw.)

This is a nicely priced 7850: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202004

Also side note: you can enable physx in borderlands 2 by going into an ini file and changing a setting, it will run physx from the cpu so you will take a hit performance wise but you would even with an nvidia card. It looks exactly the same is if you ran physx from a physx enabled gpu.
 
G

Guest

Guest


What I find interesting is you probably didn't read the reviews on this very site! The 650ti is the better card, although not by much.
 

determinologyz

Honorable
Sep 21, 2012
1,436
0
11,460


I also find it funny you troll on nvidia as hard as alot of people do..
 
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure how 1gb vs 2gb is for most games but if you intend to play skyrim with texture mods you want as much vram as you can get.

If you have any form of income I would probably go with the extra gb just because.

@proffet, I already addressed physx with amd cards. Its not exclusive to nvidias cards.
 

proffet

Honorable
Aug 30, 2012
489
0
10,810

I know but the frames really crawl when PhysX is on Radeon cards.
try it, enable PhysX (download) with your Radeon and then bench or monitor frames in a PhysX game.
even the higher end HD Radeons drop, do they not.?
and I never ran it off the CPU..
 
Physx cannot run off an AMD gpu, its all handled cpu side when you have an AMD gpu in your system. Atleast thats the way it was a few years ago, not sure if they opened it up a bit more.

I'll test out the frame drops for myself once I get a copy of something that actually has physx. (planning on grabbing BL2 some times soon)
 

Wazzup4567

Honorable
Oct 9, 2012
23
0
10,510


In that case, my FX 4100 wouldn't handle it that well would it?
 

Wazzup4567

Honorable
Oct 9, 2012
23
0
10,510


Im looking for a card $180 or less (Before rebates)

If I was looking at a 560, I wouldn't be able to get a Ti. Is there a noticeable difference between the normal and Ti card?



And would this card:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814162085

Out perform a 7850?

(Id love a 660, but its out of my budget ;-; )
 

luciferano

Honorable
Sep 24, 2012
1,513
0
11,810



The 560 Ti is somewhat faster than the 560 because it has a better GPU, I think that it has somewhat higher clocked memory too IIRC.

The 7850 is better overall than the 560 Ti, the non-Ti versions of the 560 don't have a chance against the 7850. They might come close in a few games, but simply throwing up the MSAA and/or overclocking lets the 7850 pull ahead greatly.

If you want a cheaper card, then a highly factory overclocked 7770 would be your best option.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102968

That one meets or beats the 650 Ti on average, albeit not by much, but it's also cheaper.

However, as others have said, AMD doesn't have native PhysX support on their graphics cards, so if you play the few games where that matters, it can be a good reason to go Nvidia.
 


Hasn't changed, physx gpu side is basically a cuda app that is nvidia proprietary.
 


Really? Got your head up your backside as what I post isn't close to what I can do as trolling. The problem with Nvidia is just terrible build quality for most of their cards and their low end truly sucks price wise except for low power consumption. Kepler is only good for DX9 and DX11 games while compute apps run like crap. OpenGL support is almost nonexistent so a lot of older games and apps do not run at all or under perform vs older cards. I found it entertaining when a 5 year old mid range card was already able to manage one third the performance at stock with physx on to a 660 in borderlands 2.

I wouldn't be grabbing the Vaseline and fapping to this pos when there is better around for similar or better prices. Then there is big Kepler which has yet to enter the market.