G
Guest
Guest
Hi all. So I've got 2 computers that I've built myself in the past 3 years and I was wondering which route I should take as far as an upgrade path.
Computer "A" (About 3 years total motherboard was originally a 890GX, but upgraded 18 months ago or so)
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
Asus Sabertooth 990fx R1 Motherboard
At the moment using a simple low powered graphics card (GT 610, since all I do on this is Netflix, Ubuntu, light gaming)
8 GB (2x4) DDR3 1600 Mhz
Windows 7 x64/ Ubuntu 12.04 Dual Boot w/128 GB Sata II SSD Drive
Other misc. stuff.
Computer "I" (about a year or so old)
Intel i3 2100
Gigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3
GTX 560 "SE" (I know, it's crappy but it was better than what I had previously. A GTS 250)
8 GB (4GB x2) DDR3 1866
OCZ Vertex R2 Plus 128 Sata II SSD
2 1TB WD Green Drives
I want to upgrade only one of these machines, and I am leaning towards getting a SB 2500K. But this Intel motherboard has had some serious flaws in the past. Namely boot loop (seems common on the Z68 platform) and when running the UEFI BIOS on it, somehow the BIOS became corrupted (thankfully the DualBIOS did it's job and I was able to revert to non-UEFI bios)
I'm not happy with the results of the PileDriver based AMD's (they don't seem to justify the cost compared to the performance of my soon-to-be out of warranty 1055T) but since I do a fair bit of video work and visualization I might need the extra "Cores" (if you can call them that, from what I understand each "module" is the real core and what amd calls a "core" is similar to Intel's HT technology). I am also not happy with the direction AMD is taking as a company and laying off a huge amount of workers and the fact they don't even have a dedicated chip manufacturer (Didn't they part ways with GlobalFoundries?)
I just need some opinions. I am fairly happy with both builds at the moment, but I know the AMD one is getting long in the tooth, as well as if I decide to go back to PC Gaming (which I probably will during Winter) I know that my old i3 just isn't much any more and the money would probably be better spent on that machine.
Thoughts?
Computer "A" (About 3 years total motherboard was originally a 890GX, but upgraded 18 months ago or so)
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
Asus Sabertooth 990fx R1 Motherboard
At the moment using a simple low powered graphics card (GT 610, since all I do on this is Netflix, Ubuntu, light gaming)
8 GB (2x4) DDR3 1600 Mhz
Windows 7 x64/ Ubuntu 12.04 Dual Boot w/128 GB Sata II SSD Drive
Other misc. stuff.
Computer "I" (about a year or so old)
Intel i3 2100
Gigabyte GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3
GTX 560 "SE" (I know, it's crappy but it was better than what I had previously. A GTS 250)
8 GB (4GB x2) DDR3 1866
OCZ Vertex R2 Plus 128 Sata II SSD
2 1TB WD Green Drives
I want to upgrade only one of these machines, and I am leaning towards getting a SB 2500K. But this Intel motherboard has had some serious flaws in the past. Namely boot loop (seems common on the Z68 platform) and when running the UEFI BIOS on it, somehow the BIOS became corrupted (thankfully the DualBIOS did it's job and I was able to revert to non-UEFI bios)
I'm not happy with the results of the PileDriver based AMD's (they don't seem to justify the cost compared to the performance of my soon-to-be out of warranty 1055T) but since I do a fair bit of video work and visualization I might need the extra "Cores" (if you can call them that, from what I understand each "module" is the real core and what amd calls a "core" is similar to Intel's HT technology). I am also not happy with the direction AMD is taking as a company and laying off a huge amount of workers and the fact they don't even have a dedicated chip manufacturer (Didn't they part ways with GlobalFoundries?)
I just need some opinions. I am fairly happy with both builds at the moment, but I know the AMD one is getting long in the tooth, as well as if I decide to go back to PC Gaming (which I probably will during Winter) I know that my old i3 just isn't much any more and the money would probably be better spent on that machine.
Thoughts?