Dear Gtx 680 users. I have a request in 3dmark 11 score.
Tags:
- Nvidia
- Gtx
- Performance
-
Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
litwicki23
October 10, 2012 11:09:49 AM
Hey guys. I will be very greatful. Can somebody make for me 5 loops from a row in 3dmark 11 in performance mode?
I ask because i have very big differences in results.
I mean scores on my card,are : 9458 to 9399 then 9438 to 9396 , then 9436 to 9391 and 9391 to 9442. ( score to score, from a row )
If somebody make 5 loops and paste here scores ok? Please , please. Cheers.
pc:
3770k 3.5 stock
Msi Twin Frozr Gtx 680
8gb ram
301 whql
Please have the same clocks on cpu and gpu on that loops.
I want to know what is your the most bigger difference in points between score to next score.
I mean from a row. So i ask about first 5 scores.
If somebody will be have similiar like me differences of 40-59 points i will be more patient.
I ask because i have very big differences in results.
I mean scores on my card,are : 9458 to 9399 then 9438 to 9396 , then 9436 to 9391 and 9391 to 9442. ( score to score, from a row )
If somebody make 5 loops and paste here scores ok? Please , please. Cheers.
pc:
3770k 3.5 stock
Msi Twin Frozr Gtx 680
8gb ram
301 whql
Please have the same clocks on cpu and gpu on that loops.
I want to know what is your the most bigger difference in points between score to next score.
I mean from a row. So i ask about first 5 scores.
If somebody will be have similiar like me differences of 40-59 points i will be more patient.
More about : dear gtx 680 users request 3dmark score
BigMack70
October 10, 2012 11:15:09 AM
"most bigger"
Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.
Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.
litwicki23
October 10, 2012 4:01:47 PM
Guys i am very greatful for your help. I am very pleased . But i want to ask about last thing. Here are my latest scores. And that fluctuations between scores are ok or not? PLeaseeee. Look:
http://s9.postimage.org/4hlt8b9in/nowadrugatwin16.jpg
http://s10.postimage.org/gwo2eosih/nowadrugatwin18.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/6c9tlr3hb/nowadrugatwin19.jpg
http://s11.postimage.org/js7om5qib/nowadrugatwin20.jpg
http://s8.postimage.org/hupeu82z9/nowadrugatwin21.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/v6xwtkdpb/nowadrugatwin22.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/4m0fv4hnj/nowadrugatwin23.jpg
http://s9.postimage.org/4hlt8b9in/nowadrugatwin16.jpg
http://s10.postimage.org/gwo2eosih/nowadrugatwin18.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/6c9tlr3hb/nowadrugatwin19.jpg
http://s11.postimage.org/js7om5qib/nowadrugatwin20.jpg
http://s8.postimage.org/hupeu82z9/nowadrugatwin21.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/v6xwtkdpb/nowadrugatwin22.jpg
http://s17.postimage.org/4m0fv4hnj/nowadrugatwin23.jpg
Related resources
- Boost level on Gtx 680 and scores in 3dmark 11 - Forum
- GTX 770 Low 3Dmark 11 Score? - Forum
- i7 2700k and Zotac GTX 680 low 3DMark Physics score help! - Forum
- GTX 680 decent rig - low 3dmark score - Forum
- GTX670 4gb SLI i7 3DMark 11 Score of 12,000? - Forum
BigMack70
October 10, 2012 5:17:46 PM
litwicki23
October 10, 2012 5:39:25 PM
Kepler cards with their Turbo Boost technology will run at different clock speeds under different scenarios, even when running the same benchmark. As the card heats up over subsequent runs, the Turbo Boost will not sustain as long or hit the same maximum clock speeds. It should be expected that you will have variance based on the behavior of your Turbo Boost and your temperature and/or fan speeds.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-r...
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-r...
litwicki23
October 10, 2012 6:35:24 PM
deathengine
October 10, 2012 6:42:58 PM
SYR_M3Mo
October 10, 2012 10:40:11 PM
SYR_M3Mo
October 10, 2012 10:51:11 PM
bystander said:
I'm pretty sure he is. That is the graphics scores that 680's typically get at stock settings. Perhaps slightly higher than stock.thats a bit weird.
on my EVGA 680 SC i got 10585 graphics score.
but the overall score is low i think, and thats what 3dmark showed me that score is low i got 8428.
i5 3570k stock
EVGA 680 SC
8GB DDR3 1333
cooldudesubho
October 10, 2012 10:54:23 PM
SYR_M3Mo said:
thats a bit weird.on my EVGA 680 SC i got 10585 graphics score.
but the overall score is low i think, and thats what 3dmark showed me that score is low i got 8428.
i5 3570k stock
EVGA 680 SC
8GB DDR3 1333
Is the EVGA 680 SC overclocked from the factory? I think it is, which would explain the higher score.
Plus the latest drivers give a pretty substantial boost in scores as well.
SYR_M3Mo
October 10, 2012 10:59:21 PM
bystander said:
Is the EVGA 680 SC overclocked from the factory? I think it is, which would explain the higher score.Plus the latest drivers give a pretty substantial boost in scores as well.
yes oc'd from factory
could you please tell me what was your graphics score and the overall score in performance mode in 3dmark11 ?
SYR_M3Mo
October 10, 2012 11:08:14 PM
With a single EVGA 680 Signature+ (1086 core clock) and a +100 memory overclock (forgot to disable before run):
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619577
These are much higher scores than when I first got the card, due to drivers and maybe 3dmark11 updates as well.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619577
These are much higher scores than when I first got the card, due to drivers and maybe 3dmark11 updates as well.
SYR_M3Mo
October 10, 2012 11:30:37 PM
bystander said:
With a single EVGA 680 Signature+ (1086 core clock) and a +100 memory overclock (forgot to disable before run):http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619577
These are much higher scores than when I first got the card, due to drivers and maybe 3dmark11 updates as well.
thanks for your help score is too close to mine.
SYR_M3Mo said:
thanks for your help score is too close to mine.
We pretty much have the same card I think.
Btw, in SLI: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619672
SYR_M3Mo
October 11, 2012 12:00:05 AM
bystander said:
We pretty much have the same card I think.Btw, in SLI: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619672
nice, enjoy those BEASTS
litwicki23
October 11, 2012 8:00:01 AM
cooldudesubho said:
My highest are lowest 3d mark11 score with gtx 670 is 8820 to 8750.Its completely normal esciapply with kepler boost clock.You GPU starts clocking down by 10mhz once it reaches 70c.If my card reaches 70C and GPU stars clocking down ,card is overheating? OR you mean that only GPU BOOST turbo clock is only clocking down?
litwicki23 said:
If my card reaches 70C and GPU stars clocking down ,card is overheating? OR you mean that only GPU BOOST turbo clock is only clocking down?It's only the Turbo Boost that will not go as high with a hotter GPU.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_6...
cooldudesubho
October 11, 2012 4:42:04 PM
litwicki23
October 11, 2012 5:39:14 PM
litwicki23
October 12, 2012 7:24:05 AM
BigMack70 said:
"most bigger"
Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.
You mean 200+ points variance is bad? And something overheating then?
litwicki23
October 12, 2012 7:25:41 AM
BigMack70 said:
"most bigger"
Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.
You mean if somebody have variance of 200+ points, this is bad? And something is overheating then?
BigMack70
October 12, 2012 10:38:08 AM
mrbenkhard
April 17, 2013 7:32:00 AM
Hi it seams ur scores are normal!
i have bigger flux since i overclocked my gtx 680 ( increased Core clock with 125 mhz and mem clock with 700mhz )
and i have better graphic score than u do only thing is im running AMD wich is kind of a bottleneck on this bench so my overal score is lower but i score arround 11-12K graphicly and only 4-5K physic.
So dont worrly its perfeclty normal the way your scores are!
enjoy your card!
i have bigger flux since i overclocked my gtx 680 ( increased Core clock with 125 mhz and mem clock with 700mhz )
and i have better graphic score than u do only thing is im running AMD wich is kind of a bottleneck on this bench so my overal score is lower but i score arround 11-12K graphicly and only 4-5K physic.
So dont worrly its perfeclty normal the way your scores are!
enjoy your card!
Related resources
- GTX 670 Low 3DMark 11 score Forum
- SolvedLow physics score with 3Dmark11 with my MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 2048 MB Forum
- Gtx 590 3Dmark 11 score Forum
- SLI'd Gtx 560 ti, 3dMark 11, "Your Score is Low"? Why? Forum
- GTX 680 - poor 3DMark 11 results? Forum
- Msi Lightning GTX680 3D Mark 11 Score. Forum
- 3dmark11 score (gigabyte gtx 680 windforce 3x) Forum
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!