Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Dear Gtx 680 users. I have a request in 3dmark 11 score.

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
October 10, 2012 11:09:49 AM

Hey guys. I will be very greatful. Can somebody make for me 5 loops from a row in 3dmark 11 in performance mode?
I ask because i have very big differences in results.
I mean scores on my card,are : 9458 to 9399 then 9438 to 9396 , then 9436 to 9391 and 9391 to 9442. ( score to score, from a row )
If somebody make 5 loops and paste here scores ok? Please , please. Cheers.

pc:
3770k 3.5 stock
Msi Twin Frozr Gtx 680
8gb ram
301 whql



Please have the same clocks on cpu and gpu on that loops.


I want to know what is your the most bigger difference in points between score to next score.
I mean from a row. So i ask about first 5 scores.

If somebody will be have similiar like me differences of 40-59 points i will be more patient.
October 10, 2012 11:15:09 AM

"most bigger" :lol: 

Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.
October 10, 2012 4:01:47 PM
Related resources
October 10, 2012 5:17:46 PM

Again... you're seeing < 1% fluctuation, which is normal for almost any GPU benchmark, so I'm unsure why you're concerned by this. Did you expect to get the exact same numeric score each time?
October 10, 2012 5:39:25 PM

But i am worried about 50+- differences in points,only
a c 385 Î Nvidia
October 10, 2012 5:59:17 PM

Kepler cards with their Turbo Boost technology will run at different clock speeds under different scenarios, even when running the same benchmark. As the card heats up over subsequent runs, the Turbo Boost will not sustain as long or hit the same maximum clock speeds. It should be expected that you will have variance based on the behavior of your Turbo Boost and your temperature and/or fan speeds.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-r...
October 10, 2012 6:35:24 PM

50 points its too much? something wrong with temp?
October 10, 2012 6:42:58 PM

50 points is not too much. Quit worrying and enjoy the card!!
a b Î Nvidia
October 10, 2012 6:45:31 PM

No. 50 points out of close to 10,000 is nowhere NEAR to a problem.

The card's clock varies naturally - it's supposed to.

Your temperatures are fine.
October 10, 2012 10:40:11 PM

could you tell me what was the graphic score for your gtx 680?

the graphics score only.. not the overall score.
a c 80 Î Nvidia
October 10, 2012 10:46:25 PM

SYR_M3Mo said:
could you tell me what was the graphic score for your gtx 680?

the graphics score only.. not the overall score.


I'm pretty sure he is. That is the graphics scores that 680's typically get at stock settings. Perhaps slightly higher than stock.
October 10, 2012 10:51:11 PM

bystander said:
I'm pretty sure he is. That is the graphics scores that 680's typically get at stock settings. Perhaps slightly higher than stock.


thats a bit weird.

on my EVGA 680 SC i got 10585 graphics score.

but the overall score is low i think, and thats what 3dmark showed me that score is low i got 8428.

i5 3570k stock
EVGA 680 SC
8GB DDR3 1333
October 10, 2012 10:54:23 PM

My highest are lowest 3d mark11 score with gtx 670 is 8820 to 8750.Its completely normal esciapply with kepler boost clock.You GPU starts clocking down by 10mhz once it reaches 70c.
a c 80 Î Nvidia
October 10, 2012 10:56:33 PM

SYR_M3Mo said:
thats a bit weird.

on my EVGA 680 SC i got 10585 graphics score.

but the overall score is low i think, and thats what 3dmark showed me that score is low i got 8428.

i5 3570k stock
EVGA 680 SC
8GB DDR3 1333


Is the EVGA 680 SC overclocked from the factory? I think it is, which would explain the higher score.

Plus the latest drivers give a pretty substantial boost in scores as well.
October 10, 2012 10:59:21 PM

bystander said:
Is the EVGA 680 SC overclocked from the factory? I think it is, which would explain the higher score.

Plus the latest drivers give a pretty substantial boost in scores as well.


yes oc'd from factory

could you please tell me what was your graphics score and the overall score in performance mode in 3dmark11 ?
a c 80 Î Nvidia
October 10, 2012 11:06:48 PM

SYR_M3Mo said:
yes oc'd from factory

could you please tell me what was your graphics score and the overall score in performance mode in 3dmark11 ?


Give me a few minutes. I have to update my drivers and run a new score. Things have changed over the months.
October 10, 2012 11:08:14 PM

bystander said:
Give me a few minutes. I have to update my drivers and run a new score. Things have changed over the months.


thanks appreciate it.
a c 80 Î Nvidia
October 10, 2012 11:24:45 PM

With a single EVGA 680 Signature+ (1086 core clock) and a +100 memory overclock (forgot to disable before run):
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619577

These are much higher scores than when I first got the card, due to drivers and maybe 3dmark11 updates as well.
October 10, 2012 11:30:37 PM

bystander said:
With a single EVGA 680 Signature+ (1086 core clock) and a +100 memory overclock (forgot to disable before run):
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4619577

These are much higher scores than when I first got the card, due to drivers and maybe 3dmark11 updates as well.


thanks for your help score is too close to mine. :) 
October 11, 2012 8:00:01 AM

cooldudesubho said:
My highest are lowest 3d mark11 score with gtx 670 is 8820 to 8750.Its completely normal esciapply with kepler boost clock.You GPU starts clocking down by 10mhz once it reaches 70c.



If my card reaches 70C and GPU stars clocking down ,card is overheating? OR you mean that only GPU BOOST turbo clock is only clocking down?
a c 385 Î Nvidia
October 11, 2012 3:00:46 PM

litwicki23 said:
If my card reaches 70C and GPU stars clocking down ,card is overheating? OR you mean that only GPU BOOST turbo clock is only clocking down?

It's only the Turbo Boost that will not go as high with a hotter GPU.


http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_6...
October 11, 2012 4:42:04 PM

Only the kepler boost clock downclocks.The card will never go down below its base clock no matter how much it overheats.It will generally shut down once it reaches critical temperatures.I generally get the best score when i run 3dmark11 just after booting my PC.My gtx 670 is stock speed.
October 11, 2012 5:39:14 PM

cooldudesubho ok man, so tell me what variations between scores you have.
And what is your the most highest difference between score to next score. From a row:) Thx
October 12, 2012 7:24:05 AM

BigMack70 said:
"most bigger" :lol: 

Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.




You mean 200+ points variance is bad? And something overheating then?
October 12, 2012 7:25:41 AM

BigMack70 said:
"most bigger" :lol: 

Anyways, don't have a 680 here, but those scores look perfectly normal and that's also a normal level of variance from run to run, so I'm not sure what the point of this topic is. If you were seeing variance of +/- 200 points or more I'd start to wonder if something was screwing with performance, but you're only seeing minor variance which is normal. I'm not sure why you think it's a "very big" difference as there's not even a 1% difference between your highest and lowest scores there.


You mean if somebody have variance of 200+ points, this is bad? And something is overheating then?
October 12, 2012 10:38:08 AM

Dude. You're paranoid. Your system is fine. 100% normal. You're not seeing variation of any significance. Chill and enjoy your hardware. Go play some games and stop staring at 3dmark11 scores. :bounce: 
April 17, 2013 7:32:00 AM

Hi it seams ur scores are normal!

i have bigger flux since i overclocked my gtx 680 ( increased Core clock with 125 mhz and mem clock with 700mhz )
and i have better graphic score than u do only thing is im running AMD wich is kind of a bottleneck on this bench so my overal score is lower but i score arround 11-12K graphicly and only 4-5K physic.

So dont worrly its perfeclty normal the way your scores are!

enjoy your card!
!