Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital SLR > 300d vs 350d for action shots and low light
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

I recently bought a lightly used 300d. I've been pleased with the
results, but there are 2 gripes about it for the indoor and outdoor action
photography I do.
1) Speed - faster 'on' would be a huge asset when photographing horses.
Sometimes that moment you want to capture doesn't wait 1.5s. Does it really
help you action photographers that much?

2) Noise - in low light, or high speed shutter situations this is a big
challenge. Although I can mostly blame my inexperience, at ISO 800 and 1600
I would like better results. (Side question: would better quality lenses be
a more significant improvement? - I'm using the 18-55 kit lens and 75-300
Tamron since I'm starting on a budget)

I've heard the 350d is improved in these areas. I would appreciate any
comments as to whether I would benefit noticeably if I sold the 300d now
(while it's still in perfect shape) and upgraded to the 350d.

Thanks,

Dave

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Dave,

If you don't mind post-processing for getting rid of the noise, Neat Image
does a good job. It would help with that budget you're starting. :-)

http://www.neatimage.com/

--
John Tucker
Integrity Web Design
www.integrity-web-design.com


David Geesaman wrote:
> I recently bought a lightly used 300d. I've been pleased with the
> results, but there are 2 gripes about it for the indoor and outdoor
> action photography I do.
> 1) Speed - faster 'on' would be a huge asset when photographing
> horses. Sometimes that moment you want to capture doesn't wait 1.5s. Does
> it really help you action photographers that much?
>
> 2) Noise - in low light, or high speed shutter situations this is a
> big challenge. Although I can mostly blame my inexperience, at ISO
> 800 and 1600 I would like better results. (Side question: would
> better quality lenses be a more significant improvement? - I'm using
> the 18-55 kit lens and 75-300 Tamron since I'm starting on a budget)
>
> I've heard the 350d is improved in these areas. I would
> appreciate any comments as to whether I would benefit noticeably if I
> sold the 300d now (while it's still in perfect shape) and upgraded to
> the 350d.
> Thanks,
>
> Dave

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

In article <d5t4h10ufh@news1.newsguy.com>, David Geesaman
<dgeesamannospam@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I recently bought a lightly used 300d. I've been pleased with the
> results, but there are 2 gripes about it for the indoor and outdoor action
> photography I do.
> 1) Speed - faster 'on' would be a huge asset when photographing horses.
> Sometimes that moment you want to capture doesn't wait 1.5s. Does it really
> help you action photographers that much?

I've set the "auto power off" timer to 8 minutes... Onlike P&S cameras
that tend to have their screens on a lot, the 300D will not use much
battery just sitting on.

> 2) Noise - in low light, or high speed shutter situations this is a big
> challenge. Although I can mostly blame my inexperience, at ISO 800 and 1600
> I would like better results. (Side question: would better quality lenses be
> a more significant improvement? - I'm using the 18-55 kit lens and 75-300
> Tamron since I'm starting on a budget)

I shoot indoor volleyball. I bought a Mk I 50mm 1.8 to use in really
low light, but so far I'm getting great results with the kit lens and
running ISO 3200 (from the Russian hack). Then I post-process with
Noise Ninja. Noise Ninja allows you to easily create a custom noise
profile for your specific camera and lens at eash ISO setting, and when
run with a custom profile does an amazing job.

http://www.picturecode.com/index.htm


> I've heard the 350d is improved in these areas. I would appreciate any
> comments as to whether I would benefit noticeably if I sold the 300d now
> (while it's still in perfect shape) and upgraded to the 350d.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Steve Cutchen wrote:

>
> I shoot indoor volleyball. I bought a Mk I 50mm 1.8 to use in really
> low light, but so far I'm getting great results with the kit lens and
> running ISO 3200 (from the Russian hack). Then I post-process with
> Noise Ninja. Noise Ninja allows you to easily create a custom noise
> profile for your specific camera and lens at eash ISO setting, and when
> run with a custom profile does an amazing job.


I'd like to see a lot more skin (faces, etc) before deciding how good
noise ninja is or isn't.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Steve Cutchen wrote:
>
> I've set the "auto power off" timer to 8 minutes... Onlike P&S cameras
> that tend to have their screens on a lot, the 300D will not use much
> battery just sitting on.


I've left my D70 on overnight & the battery is fine!?!?

--
Paul Furman
http://www.edgehill.net/1
san francisco native plants

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

In article <5dCdneycnq0JTB_fRVn-2g@speakeasy.net>,
Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:
>Steve Cutchen wrote:
>>
>> I've set the "auto power off" timer to 8 minutes... Onlike P&S cameras
>> that tend to have their screens on a lot, the 300D will not use much
>> battery just sitting on.
>
>
>I've left my D70 on overnight & the battery is fine!?!?

Sure -- it does not do a full power off -- but it turns off
everything which draws much power (the display, autofocus, that sort of
thing), and it can last quite a long time just running the cameratop
display -- and ready to spring to life at the half-press of a shutter
button.

And even when you turn it "off" with the switch around the
button, it is still running a part of the cameratop display -- the
remaining exposures count, and the sensors to tell when you remove or
install a CF card, so it can update the count.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Alan Browne wrote:
>
> Steve Cutchen wrote:
>
> >
> > I shoot indoor volleyball. I bought a Mk I 50mm 1.8 to use in really
> > low light, but so far I'm getting great results with the kit lens and
> > running ISO 3200 (from the Russian hack). Then I post-process with
> > Noise Ninja. Noise Ninja allows you to easily create a custom noise
> > profile for your specific camera and lens at eash ISO setting, and when
> > run with a custom profile does an amazing job.
>
> I'd like to see a lot more skin

different newsgroup? :)

> (faces, etc) before deciding how good
> noise ninja is or isn't.
>
> --
> -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
> -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
> -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
> -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Crownfield wrote:


> different newsgroup? :)


As I wrote that I knew somebody would make such a comment...

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

"Alan Browne" <alan.browne@freelunchVideotron.ca> wrote in message
news:d5vm48$5n0$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
> Crownfield wrote:
>
>
>> different newsgroup? :)
>
>
> As I wrote that I knew somebody would make such a comment...
>

well, there is always alt.binaries.nude... ;-)

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

In article <Q0Wge.13810$Fa1.4262@fed1read02>, Skip M
<shadowcatcher@cox.net> wrote:

> "Alan Browne" <alan.browne@freelunchVideotron.ca> wrote in message
> news:d5vm48$5n0$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
> > Crownfield wrote:
> >
> >
> >> different newsgroup? :)
> >
> >
> > As I wrote that I knew somebody would make such a comment...
> >
>
> well, there is always alt.binaries.nude... ;-)

or alt.binaries.nekkid...

<raised eyebrow>
Folks in THAT group are UP to something...

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital SLR > 300d vs 350d for action shots and low light
Go to:

There are 1134 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them