Quote:
Not Important, for most users. Including me.
Physx add a lot of nice effects and most of AMD users tend to just ignore it, just because amd didn't implemented this ageia technology. Playing games that support physx, with the effect add a lot of awesome effects, like cloths that rip apart, smoke/fluids that are influenced by the character movement, they are just visual effects, can be removed, but they are awesome.
I use 3D vision and i know it is "overall" the best solution for 3D gaming, other third party drivers don't support a list with so many 3D game like 3D vision drivers do.
HD3D is a gimmick, as oposing with the exclusive 3D Vision drivers, there is actually no HD3D, if you read on amd website, they say that you need to use those third party drivers that i mentioned before, meaning that you can do that with a nvidia gpu if you want too it is not a AMD specific solution...
Quote:
AMD OpenCL is much better in GPU Compute than CUDA (particularly in this generation).
Yes CUDA depends on the softwares to implement it, and not much softwares implement it, but some great softwares already do and the performance it gives is very impressive.
Quote:
Not very important either, the performance jump between each driver update is not significant. Not like catalyst, where 12.11 will rock out
![:lol: :lol:]()
. So, they have the same performance increase. From my experience their driver are both fine, I found out that nvidia's one is better, but just that. They both have bugs,
The performance jump is significant you can see the latest beta drivers added 15% performance upgrade for the 600 series:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-geforc...
But it is not just that, on a lot of recent games you can check they have some specific AMD fix folders, to install if you have AMD cards, that is something to consider too...
Quote:
It was actually released $550, which that time is just $50 more than the 580, while beating it with a big gap. So it's not because of the reasons that you gave us, it's because they want to take profit when there are not any competition. They had to lower prices because they want to compete with nvidia. If they keep with old prices, there will be no competition.
I know there is a lot of other variables, not just what i have said is what made they sell for that price, but the point is that nvidia made they lower the price, instead of matching the price, and i think that AMD would not have done the same. Now they had to "match" the prices to improve the outcome;
Spoiler
So, there is no reason why you should get rid of ATi/AMD.
Of course there is no reason to get rid of any of them, there should always be competition, that is what cause them to improve the technology and drop the prices. i just pointed out that the extra price of the 680 have some motives. even if they are futile like you said physx is.