GTX 480 or GTX 660?
Tags:
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
So, I'm building a new PC. I ordered a GTX 480, but I'm beginning to have second thoughts. Its still in the mail, so I haven't received it quite yet. I'm having second thoughts because I could get the GTX 660 for the same price as the GTX 480. There really isn't anything on the Internet that compares the two cards.
I like the 660 because it's cooler, quieter, and uses less power. But it is only 192-bit compared to the 384-bit 480 which I believe would benefit Anti-Aliasing. The 660 has 960 CUDA cores, but the 480 only has 480 CUDA cores. The 480 is the high end of the 400 series whereas the 660 is middle of the road for the 600 series, but is the 660 powerful enough to be better than the 480?
My system is as follows:
i5-3570K
8 GB RAM
MSI Z77A-G45 Thunderbolt
256 GB Samsung 830 SSD
750 GB HDD
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? From my perspective it's like comparing red apples to green apples. I would prefer the 660 if it as powerful or more powerful, because it's cooler, quieter, and uses less power. I'm not interested in any other card except these two unless it can be had for $200 or less.
I like the 660 because it's cooler, quieter, and uses less power. But it is only 192-bit compared to the 384-bit 480 which I believe would benefit Anti-Aliasing. The 660 has 960 CUDA cores, but the 480 only has 480 CUDA cores. The 480 is the high end of the 400 series whereas the 660 is middle of the road for the 600 series, but is the 660 powerful enough to be better than the 480?
My system is as follows:
i5-3570K
8 GB RAM
MSI Z77A-G45 Thunderbolt
256 GB Samsung 830 SSD
750 GB HDD
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? From my perspective it's like comparing red apples to green apples. I would prefer the 660 if it as powerful or more powerful, because it's cooler, quieter, and uses less power. I'm not interested in any other card except these two unless it can be had for $200 or less.
More about : gtx 480 gtx 660
This website only does a hardware comparison not benchmarks.
http://www.hwcompare.com/13164/geforce-gtx-480-vs-gefor...
Assuming they know what they are talking about....
But keep in mind the 480 runs loud and hot
http://www.hwcompare.com/13164/geforce-gtx-480-vs-gefor...
Assuming they know what they are talking about....
But keep in mind the 480 runs loud and hot
The 660 is slightly more powerful than the 480 at stock, and although the 480 has much better overclocking potential, it runs much hotter uses much more power and is much louder.
Not to mention the 660 has all of the Kepler features such as Adaptive V-sync, GPU boost and TXAA.
I would see if you can return the 480 and go with the 660. If not, the 480 is one beast of a card.
Not to mention the 660 has all of the Kepler features such as Adaptive V-sync, GPU boost and TXAA.
I would see if you can return the 480 and go with the 660. If not, the 480 is one beast of a card.
Best solution
lets look at some benches with using the GTX 580 as a "control card"
the 480 in metro 2033
![]()
16.6/24.7=68.4% performance of the GTX 580
![]()
21.8/27.3=79.8% performance of the GTX 580 (the blue bar is "stock")
crysis anyone?
![]()
32.6/38.5=84.6%
![]()
38/41.7=91%
so in this rather unscientific example the 660 is clearly better in a highly demanding games such as metro 2033 and crysis.
the 480 in metro 2033

16.6/24.7=68.4% performance of the GTX 580

21.8/27.3=79.8% performance of the GTX 580 (the blue bar is "stock")
crysis anyone?

32.6/38.5=84.6%

38/41.7=91%
so in this rather unscientific example the 660 is clearly better in a highly demanding games such as metro 2033 and crysis.
Related ressources
- GTX 480 vs GTX 660 (non-ti) - Forum
- Superclocked GTX660 vs GTX 480 Fermi - Forum
- GTX 480 BF3 1080p Low Settings FPS? - Forum
- Dual GTX 480 's in SLI Computer restarting - Forum
- http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] rts-stores - Forum
Anonymous said:
lets look at some benches with using the GTX 580 as a "control card"the 480 in metro 2033
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_580/images/metro_2033_1920_1200.gif
16.6/24.7=68.4% performance of the GTX 580
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Direct_Cu_II/images/metro_2033_1920_1200.gif
21.8/27.3=79.8% performance of the GTX 580 (the blue bar is "stock")
crysis anyone?
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_580/images/crysis_1920_1200.gif
32.6/38.5=84.6%
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Direct_Cu_II/images/crysis_1920_1200.gif
38/41.7=91%
so in this rather unscientific example the 660 is clearly better in a highly demanding games such as metro 2033 and crysis.
You made a mistake on your calcs for the gtx 480 in metro, the 480 gets 21.6, not 16.6.
So the 660 and the 480 basically tie, while the 480 can overclock to match the 580, the 660 has bad OC potential.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/09/19/asus_geforce_...
maxalge said:
You made a mistake on your calcs for the gtx 480 in metro, the 480 gets 21.6, not 16.6. So the 660 and the 480 basically tie, while the 480 can overclock to match the 580, the 660 has bad OC potential.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/09/19/asus_geforce_...
AH!
but that leaves 1 to 1 lets look at a third, just for the H E double hockey sticks of it:


nope! can't use those . .different AA settings. though it is not surprise with the larger memory bandwidth the 480 is apparently ahead.
btw, the reviews i used (bad from not to give a citation!)
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_5...
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660...
btw, thanks for the correction and not being insulting about me making a mistake.
cheers.
Also, it looks like the 660 looks like a better option on this premise. How many people typically OC there gpu maybe there CPU but rarely there GPU. Also a another contributing factor is the tech that goes into the 660 dx11 and the opengl version. You are getting a more complete featured card with the 660 and you are getting a tie in performance.
bigshootr8 said:
Also, it looks like the 660 looks like a better option on this premise. How many people typically OC there gpu maybe there CPU but rarely there GPU. Also a another contributing factor is the tech that goes into the 660 dx11 and the opengl version. You are getting a more complete featured card with the 660 and you are getting a tie in performance.The 480 is dx11 as well, and had adaptive v-sync too, I believe it also has a lot more mature opengl, not quite sure about the last one.
Really, the only considerations should be the fact that it IS a power hungry card and it will get hot if you don't turn up the fan with a more aggressive fan profile on afterburner.
Happy hunting.
I would go 660 due to relative performance out of the box. You can also connect up to 4 displays should you choose to do so down the road. 480 can only do 2 unless you SLI another to drive more displays. You will will be warm this Winter with the 480 as you would not have to use a heater for your room =P.
Ironslice said:
The 660 is slightly more powerful than the 480 at stock, and although the 480 has much better overclocking potential, it runs much hotter uses much more power and is much louder.Not to mention the 660 has all of the Kepler features such as Adaptive V-sync, GPU boost and TXAA.
I would see if you can return the 480 and go with the 660. If not, the 480 is one beast of a card.
+1 ^ and to my knowledge adapative vsync is something new to the 600 series I checked the feature list for the gtx480 no such tech.
http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/en_US/pdf/GTX-480-4...
680 first to use it
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/04/16/nvidia_adapti...
http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/en_US/pdf/GTX-480-4...
680 first to use it
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/04/16/nvidia_adapti...
bigshootr8 said:
+1 ^ and to my knowledge adapative vsync is something new to the 600 series I checked the feature list for the gtx480 no such tech. http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/en_US/pdf/GTX-480-4...
680 first to use it
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/04/16/nvidia_adapti...
I am running the newest nvidia drivers, and the options lets me choose adaptive vsync, which I have enabled.
Would their own drivers lie?
bigshootr8 said:
+1 ^ and to my knowledge adapative vsync is something new to the 600 series I checked the feature list for the gtx480 no such tech. http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/en_US/pdf/GTX-480-4...
680 first to use it
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/04/16/nvidia_adapti...
Yup, gtx 480 gets FXAA and adaptive vsync since 301.24 beta. =)
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/geforce-301-24-beta-gt...
maxalge said:
Yup, gtx 480 gets FXAA and adaptive vsync since 301.24 beta. =)http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/geforce-301-24-beta-gt...
Maximus_Delta said:
Never Settle !!!Get an AMD card.
This song comes to mind. Its the AMD v NVIDIA wars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnR3Rln5qzc
bigshootr8 said:
This song comes to mind. Its the AMD v NVIDIA wars http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnR3Rln5qzc
Related ressources:
- Forumhttp://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] rts-stores
- Forum2x eVGA GTX 480 s - 3 screen
- ForumUpgrading from Gigabyte GTX480 - Worth it at this point in time?
- ForumGtx 480 sli upgrade.
- ForumGTX 480
- ForumIs my gtx480 really dead?
- ForumUpgrading from GTX 480
- ForumAdvice choosing new GTX660
- ForumShould I buy 2 nvidia geforce gtx 480 's or get 1 670?
- ForumArctic cooling accel x3 and the GTX 480
- ForumIs AMD FX4170 compatible with GeForce GTX 480 ?
- ForumGTX 480 vs GTX 600 series
- Forum3ds Max - Quadro 4000 vs GTX660/660 ti
- ForumWill a CX600 hold on an GTX480
- ForumAsus gtx560ti directcuII-broken
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!