Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital SLR > Any truth to this rumour? (Minolta)

Any truth to this rumour? (Minolta)

Forum Digital Camera : Digital SLR - Any truth to this rumour? (Minolta)

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

That the Minolta IS in camera mechanism acts
as a dust reducer, somewhat like the Olympus
mechanism? I read it, I don't know if it's true.
If it is, then I'd say Minolta comes as close to
the most "modern" digital SLR out there. Since I
sold off my Olympus SLR equipment I'm free to pursue
any brand I want, not being tied down to any one lens
set.
-Rich

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

RichA wrote:

> That the Minolta IS in camera mechanism acts
> as a dust reducer, somewhat like the Olympus
> mechanism?

I think "somewhat" is the key word here. Is there anything inside to catch
the dust it might shake off?

Does minolta say this anywhere? I can't imagine they would ignore this
marketing tool if they believed this was true, even just a little bit.
Sounds more like wishful thinking to me but there might be something to it.

--

Stacey

Reply to Stacey

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Stacey <fotocord@yahoo.com> wrote:

>RichA wrote:
>
>> That the Minolta IS in camera mechanism acts
>> as a dust reducer, somewhat like the Olympus
>> mechanism?
>
>I think "somewhat" is the key word here. Is there anything inside to catch
>the dust it might shake off?

There is nothing to catch the dust. I imagine loose dust would be an
embarrassment, because it could enter the anti shake mechanism causing
all kinds of problems.

>Does minolta say this anywhere? I can't imagine they would ignore this
>marketing tool if they believed this was true, even just a little bit.
>Sounds more like wishful thinking to me but there might be something to it.

See above.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

RichA wrote:

> That the Minolta IS in camera mechanism acts
> as a dust reducer, somewhat like the Olympus
> mechanism? I read it, I don't know if it's true.

I doubt the claim very much.

I've read the same opinion, and my counter opinion is that the A-S in
the Minolta is at far too low a frequency to shake much dust off. (Some
dust will, some dust won't, IOW, depending on 'kind', mass, sticky
surface, kind of attraction (static, humidity), etc.)

Further, there is no 'trap' in the 7D even if the dust did come off, so
it will eventually find its way back onto the sensor (I beleive the Oly
has some kind of a trap mechanism for the dust, not sure what).

> If it is, then I'd say Minolta comes as close to
> the most "modern" digital SLR out there. Since I
> sold off my Olympus SLR equipment I'm free to pursue
> any brand I want, not being tied down to any one lens
> set.

It is definitely one of the best and not only because of the A-S. The
camera can rightly claim "best ergonomics" of all DSLR's. Well laid
out, large monitor, great build.

In http://www.aliasimages.com/Max7Drev.htm I note the positives and
negatives of the 7D. I suggest the Phil Askey review as well.

http://www.aliasimages.com/KM7D_AS_Test.htm

Cheers,
Alan.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> writes:

> It is definitely one of the best and not only because of the A-S. The camera
> can rightly claim "best ergonomics" of all DSLR's. Well laid out, large
> monitor, great build.

I dunno. Ergonomics is such a personal decision. When I was buying my DSLR, I
had the Minolta 7D and the Olympus E-1, and I felt the E-1 was better. To each
their own.

--
Michael Meissner
email: mrmnews@the-meissners.org
http://www.the-meissners.org

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Michael Meissner wrote:

> Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> writes:
>
>
>>It is definitely one of the best and not only because of the A-S. The camera
>>can rightly claim "best ergonomics" of all DSLR's. Well laid out, large
>>monitor, great build.
>
>
> I dunno. Ergonomics is such a personal decision. When I was buying my DSLR, I
> had the Minolta 7D and the Olympus E-1, and I felt the E-1 was better. To each
> their own.

Indeed. However:

a) if you want all photographic controls to be available without going
into menus, the 7D can't be beat;

b) just about every review remarks on the user interface of the 7D as
being about the best from a photographer POV.

Cheers,
Alan



--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital SLR > Any truth to this rumour? (Minolta)
Go to:

There are 721 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them