Schlect

Honorable
Nov 12, 2012
74
0
10,630
It seems good, aside from the fact that it has a 7ms latency. The latency is really preference, if you are really paranoid about the slightest lag than you could try for a 2ms - 3 ms monitor. As far as the refresh rate goes, it's 60. This wont really be a problem since the human eye can only see at about 60 but i guess if you wanted you could try for an 85 hz or 120.
 

syphn

Honorable
Dec 17, 2012
12
0
10,510


I was concerned about that too, but I was reading around the web and a lot of people were saying that latency is never really accurate and not to base it off of that.

Do you have anything better you'd recommend? I'd like to keep the purchase of all 3 monitors under $1000 if possible.

Thanks!
 

nawit

Honorable
Dec 21, 2012
82
0
10,640
Stick to ASUS and you'll usually get great quality when it comes to monitors. The one I linked is what I would get in your situation but since you have a larger budget you might look for something else. But why spend more money when its not necessary? :p
 

syphn

Honorable
Dec 17, 2012
12
0
10,510

Also, do you think an IPS monitor is better than the one you linked?
 

nawit

Honorable
Dec 21, 2012
82
0
10,640
[strike]Clearly IPS is better but look at the price difference: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236262[/strike]
^ Not true IPS

Personally don't think it's necessary but, hey, if you have the money why not.



Edit- I'm dumb