Hello,
I am using a 560 GPU in an older HP workstation xw8600. I use this for video editing solely. I edit with Adobe Premiere Pro 5.5, which has CUDA acceleration. I am considering stepping up in CUDA cores to a 600 series card, namely the 660ti. This card is listed as PCIe 3.0. My question is will I incur a bottleneck using a PCIe 2.0 slot for this card-or should I stick with the upper end of the 500 series cards (580,590 etc.)? I think all 500 series cards are PCIe 2.0 (please correct me if wrong). I experienced a big jump moving from the the 550ti to the 560. There is a boost in Adobe and it looks like the more CUDA cores the better the scrubbing a playback from the timeline. I am only editing and doing some light color correction, no gaming and am looking only to optimize for this specific use. I am a little committed to the xw8600 at this time, so a mobo swap is out. Thanks for any and all comments.
Jack
I am using a 560 GPU in an older HP workstation xw8600. I use this for video editing solely. I edit with Adobe Premiere Pro 5.5, which has CUDA acceleration. I am considering stepping up in CUDA cores to a 600 series card, namely the 660ti. This card is listed as PCIe 3.0. My question is will I incur a bottleneck using a PCIe 2.0 slot for this card-or should I stick with the upper end of the 500 series cards (580,590 etc.)? I think all 500 series cards are PCIe 2.0 (please correct me if wrong). I experienced a big jump moving from the the 550ti to the 560. There is a boost in Adobe and it looks like the more CUDA cores the better the scrubbing a playback from the timeline. I am only editing and doing some light color correction, no gaming and am looking only to optimize for this specific use. I am a little committed to the xw8600 at this time, so a mobo swap is out. Thanks for any and all comments.
Jack