G
Guest
Guest
Hello all,
I would like everyone's opinion on whether it would be okay (from a performance point of view) to have multiple OS's partitioned into their "area" on one drive and their respective data/user/programs on another drives.
Here's what I'd like to do:
1. I have 3 x 36GB Ultra160 10KRPM drives
2. I would like to install Win2K, Suse Linux, Solaris 8 and WinXP onto one of the drives and each one will be partitioned equally at approx. 9 GB each.
3. The other 2 drives will be partitioned into 2 partitions (minimum) each using their respective file system. (For example: drive 2 will have 18G for Win2K and 18G for Suse and drive 3 will have 18G for Solaris and 18G for Win XP)
Is this wise?
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Christopher
I would like everyone's opinion on whether it would be okay (from a performance point of view) to have multiple OS's partitioned into their "area" on one drive and their respective data/user/programs on another drives.
Here's what I'd like to do:
1. I have 3 x 36GB Ultra160 10KRPM drives
2. I would like to install Win2K, Suse Linux, Solaris 8 and WinXP onto one of the drives and each one will be partitioned equally at approx. 9 GB each.
3. The other 2 drives will be partitioned into 2 partitions (minimum) each using their respective file system. (For example: drive 2 will have 18G for Win2K and 18G for Suse and drive 3 will have 18G for Solaris and 18G for Win XP)
Is this wise?
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Christopher